首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Bastab Ghosh, Lalgudi N. Doralrajan, Santosh Kumar, Ramanitharan Manikandan, Kaliyaperumal Muruganandham, Avijit Kumar
【24h】

Bastab Ghosh, Lalgudi N. Doralrajan, Santosh Kumar, Ramanitharan Manikandan, Kaliyaperumal Muruganandham, Avijit Kumar

机译:Bastab Ghosh,Lalgudi N.Doralrajan,Santosh Kumar,Ramanitharan Manikandan,Kaliyaperumal Muruganandham,Avijit Kumar

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare the efficacy and safety of intracorpus spongiosum block (ICSB) over topical anesthesia for performing visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) in a randomized clinical trial.VIU for urethral stricture can be performed under various types of anesthesia, including topical anesthesia. Although recent studies have shown that ICSB and general anesthesia have comparable efficacy for performing VIU, no studies have compared ICSB with topical anesthesia. Forty consenting patients with single, short, passable anterior urethral stricture were randomized into two groups. Group 1 patients received topical 2% lignocaine jelly and group 2 patients received 1% lignocaine ICSB for undergoing VIU. Pain perception during and after the procedure was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS). The changes in vital parameters during the procedure and procedure-related complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney test or t test.The mean ± standard deviation VAS scores intraoperatively (2.85 ± 1.34) and at 1-hour postoperatively (1.17 ± 0.96) were significantly lower (P <.01) in group 2 patients than the corresponding scores in group 1 (4.9 ±1.9 and 2.35 ± 1.34 respectively). The intraoperative rise in pulse rate and in blood pressure were significantly greater (P <.05) in group 1 patients (13 ± 5.1/min and 11.3 ± 6.44 mm Hg) than in group 2 (8.05 ± 5.54/min and 6.35 ± 5.86 mm Hg).ICSB is safe and more effective than topical anesthesia for providing pain relief during VIU. This should become the local anesthesia technique of choice for performing VIU.
机译:在一项随机临床试验中,比较海绵体内海绵体阻断剂(ICSB)对局部麻醉进行视觉内尿道切开术(VIU)的疗效和安全性。尽管最近的研究表明ICSB和全身麻醉在进行VIU方面具有可比的疗效,但尚无研究将ICSB与局部麻醉进行比较。将四十名同意的患有单发,短暂,可通过的前尿道狭窄的患者随机分为两组。第1组患者接受局部2%利多卡因软膏,第2组患者接受1%利多卡因ICSB进行VIU治疗。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估手术过程中和手术后的疼痛感。记录手术过程中生命参数的变化以及与手术相关的并发症。使用Mann-Whitney检验或t检验进行统计分析。第2组的术中(2.85±1.34)和术后1小时(1.17±0.96)的平均±标准偏差VAS评分显着较低(P <.01)患者比第1组的相应分数(分别为4.9±1.9和2.35±1.34)。第1组患者(13±5.1 / min和11.3±6.44 mm Hg)的术中脉搏率和血压升高明显高于第2组(8.05±5.54 / min和6.35±5.86)(P <.05)毫米汞柱).ICSB比局部麻醉更安全且更有效,可在VIU期间减轻疼痛。这应该成为进行VIU的首选局部麻醉技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号