首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Is a 1-CM margin necessary during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma?
【24h】

Is a 1-CM margin necessary during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma?

机译:肾细胞癌的保肾手术中是否需要1-CM的余量?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a 1-cm margin is necessary for cancer control during nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: A retrospective review of 67 patients who underwent NSS for RCC between 1990 and 2000 was conducted. The data collected included patient demographics, tumor size and location, histologic type and grade, margin status (positive or negative), and the shortest distance of normal parenchyma (in millimeters) around the tumor in the final pathologic specimen. Recurrence was determined from the clinical follow-up, which included physical examination, ultrasonography or computed tomography, and various laboratory tests. RESULTS: Fifty-five cases were performed open and 12 laparoscopically. The mean follow-up was 60 months (range 5 to 124). The mean tumor size was 3.0 cm (range 0.9 to 11.0). Seven patients were found to have a positive margin; 1 died of metastatic RCC, 1 was alive with systemic recurrence, and 5 had no evidence of disease. Of 11 patients with a negative margin distance of less than 1 mm, 9 were recurrence free, 1 had simultaneous local and pulmonary relapse, and the other had pulmonary recurrence only. The remainder of the study patients (n = 49) had negative margins greater than 1 mm, and all were alive without evidence of disease at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This review questions the necessity of a 1-cm margin to prevent recurrence after NSS for RCC. Additional studies to determine the optimal margin distance should be conducted.
机译:目的:确定在保留肾单位的肾细胞癌(RCC)手术期间(NSS)进行癌症控制是否需要留出1厘米的边缘。方法:回顾性分析1990年至2000年间接受NSS的RCC的67例患者。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学资料,肿瘤的大小和位置,组织学类型和等级,边缘状态(阳性或阴性)以及最终病理样本中肿瘤周围正常实质的最短距离(以毫米为单位)。从临床随访中确定复发,包括体格检查,超声检查或计算机断层扫描以及各种实验室检查。结果:55例是开放的,腹腔镜检查的是12例。平均随访时间为60个月(范围5至124)。平均肿瘤大小为3.0厘米(范围0.9至11.0)。发现有7名患者的切缘阳性。 1例因转移性RCC死亡,1例因全身复发而活着,5例无疾病迹象。在11例负边缘距离小于1 mm的患者中,有9例无复发,其中1例同时发生了局部和肺部复发,另一例仅发生了肺部复发。其余的研究患者(n = 49)的负切缘大于1毫米,并且所有患者在最后一次随访中都没有发现疾病的迹象。结论:本评价对RCS NSS术后1 cm边缘的预防性复发提出了质疑。应进行其他研究以确定最佳裕度距离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号