首页> 外文期刊>Urology >Re: White M, Maatman T. Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Two Local Anesthetic Techniques in Men Undergoing No-Scalpel Vasectomy. (Urology 2007;70: 1187-1189)
【24h】

Re: White M, Maatman T. Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Two Local Anesthetic Techniques in Men Undergoing No-Scalpel Vasectomy. (Urology 2007;70: 1187-1189)

机译:回复:White M,MaatmanT。两种局部麻醉技术在无手术刀输精管切除术中的有效性比较分析。 (Urology 2007; 70:1187-1189)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The recent report by White and Maatman comparing jet injection and needle delivery for anesthesia in no-scalpel vasectomy boasted an impressive superiority of the former compared with the latter. Although this is not surprising in my experience,1 there are a number of comments to make regarding this report.In describing their method, the authors stated that they used "2% lidocaine plain with 1:1,000,000 epineph-rine, as recommended by the manufacturer." Li and I wrote the manufacturer's guidelines for the use of this jet injector, and we specifically stated "the filling chamber is filled with approximately 4 mL of anesthetic solution, 2% lidocaine without epinephrine."
机译:怀特和马特曼(White and Maatman)的最新报告比较了无手术刀输精管切除术中麻醉的喷射注射和针头输送,与前者相比,前者具有惊人的优势。尽管从我的经验来看这并不奇怪,[1]但对于本报告还是有很多评论。在描述他们的方法时,作者说,他们使用了“ 2%利多卡因平原和1:1,000,000肾上腺素,如药物治疗师的推荐。制造商。” Li和我写了使用这种喷射注射器的制造商指南,我们特别指出:“填充室充满了约4 mL麻醉药,不含肾上腺素的2%利多卡因。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号