首页> 外文期刊>Psychometrika >The applicability of deadline models: Comment on Glickman, Gray, and Morales (2005)
【24h】

The applicability of deadline models: Comment on Glickman, Gray, and Morales (2005)

机译:截止日期模型的适用性:评论Glickman,Gray和Morales(2005)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Glickman, Gray, and Morales ( this issue) propose a statistical model for measuring the unobserved latency of stimulus-controlled processes. The model accounts for both speed and accuracy and does so by assuming that participants set an internal deadline. If a stimulus-controlled response is not produced by the deadline, the participant then guesses. The applicability of the model is discussed in this Comment. The deadline model yields specific predictions for the case in which stimulus difficulty is manipulated in a within-block manner. In this case, it is reasonable to assume that stimulus difficulty does not affect the deadline. It is shown that in common perceptual and cognitive domains, extant data do not fully meet these predictions. Hence, practitioners need be aware of the possibility and consequences of model misspecification.
机译:Glickman,Gray和Morales(本期)提出了一种统计模型,用于测量刺激控制过程的未观察到的潜伏期。该模型同时考虑了速度和准确性,并假设参与者设置了内部期限。如果在截止日期之前未产生刺激控制的反应,则参与者进行猜测。此注释中讨论了模型的适用性。期限模型针对以块内方式操纵刺激难度的情况产生了特定的预测。在这种情况下,可以合理地认为刺激难度不会影响期限。结果表明,在常见的感知和认知领域,现有数据不能完全满足这些预测。因此,从业者需要意识到模型规格不正确的可能性和后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号