...
【24h】

Transfrontal three-dimensional visualization of midline cerebral structures.

机译:中线脑部结构的额叶三维可视化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare sonographic visualization of midline cerebral structures obtained by two-dimensional (2D) imaging and three-dimensional (3D) multiplanar and volume contrast imaging in the coronal plane (VCI-C), with transfrontal 3D acquisition. METHODS: Sixty consecutive healthy fetuses in vertex presentation at a mean gestational age of 24 (range, 20-33) weeks underwent 2D and 3D ultrasound examination. Sagittal cerebral planes were reconstructed using 3D acquisition from axial planes by multiplanar analysis and by VCI-C. The reconstructed midline images of both these techniques were compared with the midline structures visualized directly in the A-plane by transfrontal 3D acquisition using a sweep angle of 30 degrees . Measurement of the corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis and visualization of the fourth ventricle and the main vermian fissures were compared. The sharpness of the images was also assessed qualitatively. Mid-sagittal tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) was also performed. 3D planes were compared with 2D transfontanelle median planes obtained by transabdominal or, when required, transvaginal sonography. RESULTS: The midline plane could be obtained in 88% of multiplanar, 82% of VCI-C and 87% of transfrontal analyses. Measurements of the corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis obtained by 3D median planes were highly correlated. The clearest and sharpest definition of midline structures was obtained with transfrontal acquisition. Primary and secondary fissures of the cerebellar vermis could be detected in 13-26% of multiplanar, 18-35% of VCI-C and 52-79% of transfrontal analyses. 2D visualization was superior or equal to the 3D transfrontal approach in all the parameters compared. CONCLUSION: 3D planes obtained from axial acquisitions are simpler and easier to display than are transfrontal ones. However, artifacts and acoustic shadowing are frequent in 3D axial acquisition and spatial resolution is better in the direct visualization transfrontal technique. If the standard examination includes a view of the fetal facial profile, a quick 3D acquisition through the frontal sutures provides direct visualization for assessment of the midline structures. We believe that this volumetric methodology could represent a step towards incorporating a comprehensive fetal neuroscan into routine targeted organ evaluation.
机译:目的:比较通过二维(2D)成像和三维(3D)多平面和体积对比成像在冠状面(VCI-C)中获得的中线大脑结构的超声显像,并进行跨额叶3D采集。方法:以平均胎龄为24周(范围20-33周)的60位连续健康胎儿的顶点进行了2D和3D超声检查。使用多平面分析和VCI-C从轴向平面进行3D采集来重建矢状脑平面。将这两种技术的重建中线图像与通过30度后掠角的经额叶3D采集直接在A平面中可视化的中线结构进行比较。比较了call体和小脑mis骨的测量以及第四脑室和主要Vermian裂隙的可视化。还对图像的清晰度进行了定性评估。还进行了矢状位中层断层超声成像(TUI)。将3D平面与通过腹部或必要时经阴道超声检查获得的2D透明font中线平面进行比较。结果:中线平面可在88%的多平面,82%的VCI-C和87%的跨额叶分析中获得。通过3D正中平面获得的call体和小脑ver骨的测量值高度相关。中线结构的最清晰,最清晰的定义是通过额额获取获得的。在多平面的13-26%,VCI-C的18-35%和跨额叶分析的52-79%中可以检测到小脑ver部的原发性和继发性裂痕。在所有比较的参数中,2D可视化效果优于或等于3D跨额叶方法。结论:从轴向获取获得的3D平面比从额叶获得的3D平面更容易显示。但是,在3D轴向采集中,伪影和声音阴影很常见,而在直接可视化的跨正面技术中,空间分辨率更好。如果标准检查包括胎儿面部轮廓的视图,则可通过额骨缝线快速进行3D采集,以直接可视化以评估中线结构。我们认为,这种体积方法论可能代表了将全面的胎儿神经扫描纳入常规靶向器官评估的一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号