首页> 外文期刊>Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >The water vapour intercomparison effort in the framework of the Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study: airborne-to-ground-based and airborne-to-airbornelidar systems
【24h】

The water vapour intercomparison effort in the framework of the Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study: airborne-to-ground-based and airborne-to-airbornelidar systems

机译:对流和地形诱发降水研究框架内的水蒸气比对工作:空基至地面和空基至空激光雷达系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An intensive water vapour intercomparison effort, involving airborne and ground-based water vapour lidar systems, was carried out in the framework of the COPS experiment. The main objective of this paper is to provide accurate error estimates for these systems. Comparisons between the ground-based Raman lidar BASIL and the airborne CNRS DIAL (Differential Absorption Lidar) indicate a mean relative bias between the two sensors, calculated with respect to the mean value of —2.13% (—0.034 g kg~(-1) )in the altitude region 0.5-3.5 km, while comparisons between BASIL and the airborne DLR DIAL lead to a mean relative bias of 1.87% (0.018 g kg~(-1) ) in this same altitude region. Comparisons between the ground-based UHOH DIAL and the CNRS DIAL indicatea bias of—3.2% (—0.37 x 10~22 m~(-3)) in the altitude range 1.5-4.5 km, while comparisons between the UHOH DIAL and the DLR DIAL indicate a bias of 0.83% (0.06 x lO~22m~(-3) ) in this same altitude range. Based on the available comparisons between theground-based Raman lidar BERTHA and the CNRS DIAL, the mean relative bias is found to be —4.37% (—0.123 g kg~(-1) ) in the altitude region 0.5-4.5 km. Comparisons between the ground-based IGN Raman lidar and the CNRS DIAL indicate a bias of 3.18% (0.55 g kg~(-1) ) in the altitude range from 0.5 to 4.5 km, while comparisons between the CNRS DIAL and DLR DIAL result in a mean relative bias of 3.93% (1.1 x 10~22 m~(-1)) in the altitude interval 0.5-4.0 km. Based on the available statistics of comparisons, benefiting from the fact that the CNRS DIAL was able to be compared with all other lidar systems, and putting equal weight on the data reliability of each instrument, overall relative values for BASIL, BERTHA, IGN Raman lidar, UHOH DIAL, DLR DIAL, and CNRS DIAL, with respect to the mean value, are found to be -0.38, -2.60,4.90, -1.43, -2.23 and 1.72%, respectively.
机译:在COPS实验的框架内,进行了深入的水蒸气比对工作,涉及空中和地面水蒸气激光雷达系统。本文的主要目的是为这些系统提供准确的误差估计。地面拉曼激光雷达BASIL与机载CNRS DIAL(差分吸收激光雷达)之间的比较表明,相对于-2.13%(-0.034 g kg〜(-1)的平均值)计算的两个传感器之间的平均相对偏差。 )在0.5-3.5 km的海拔区域内,而BASIL与机载DLR DIAL的比较导致在该相同海拔区域内的平均相对偏差为1.87%(0.018 g kg〜(-1))。地面UHOH DIAL与CNRS DIAL的比较表明,在1.5-4.5 km的高度范围内,偏差为–3.2%(-0.37 x 10〜22 m〜(-3)),而UHOH DIAL与DLR之间的比较DIAL表示在相同高度范围内的偏差为0.83%(0.06 x 10〜22m〜(-3))。根据地面拉曼激光雷达BERTHA和CNRS DIAL的可用比较,发现在0.5-4.5 km的海拔区域中,平均相对偏差为-4.37%(-0.123 g kg〜(-1))。地面IGN拉曼激光雷达和CNRS DIAL的比较表明,在0.5至4.5 km的高度范围内,偏差为3.18%(0.55 g kg〜(-1)),而CNRS DIAL和DLR DIAL的比较则为在0.5-4.0 km的高度区间内,平均相对偏差为3.93%(1.1 x 10〜22 m〜(-1))。基于比较的可用统计数据,得益于CNRS DIAL能够与所有其他激光雷达系统进行比较的事实,并且对每台仪器的数据可靠性,BASIL,BERTHA,IGN拉曼激光雷达的总体相对值给予了同等的重视,相对于平均值,UHOH DIAL,DLR DIAL和CNRS DIAL分别为-0.38,-2.60、4.90,-1.43,-2.23和1.72%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号