首页> 外文期刊>Psychology and aging >No aging bias favoring memory for positive material: Evidence from a heterogeneity-homogeneity list paradigm using emotionally toned words
【24h】

No aging bias favoring memory for positive material: Evidence from a heterogeneity-homogeneity list paradigm using emotionally toned words

机译:没有有利于记忆正材料的衰老偏见:使用情绪化的词语来自异质性-同质性列表范式的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some authors argue for a memory advantage of older adults for positively toned material. To investigate the contribution of selective processing to a positivity effect, the authors investigated young (n = 72, aged IS to 31) and older (n = 72, aged 64 to 75) adults' memory for emotionally toned words using a multitrial paradigm that compares performance for heterogeneous (mixed valence) and homogeneous (single valence) lists. Regarding the age comparison, there was no evidence for an aging bias favoring positive material. Moreover, older adults' memory was less affected by emotion-based processing prioritization. Although there was no support for age-specific processing biases in memory for emotionally toned words, the findings are consistent with proposals that negative information receives processing priority in some contexts. Possible limits to the generalizability of the present findings (e.g., to nonverbal material) are discussed.
机译:一些作者认为,老年人对正色调材料具有记忆优势。为了研究选择性处理对积极作用的贡献,作者使用一种多重尝试范式,调查了年轻人(n = 72,年龄在31岁至31岁)和年龄较大(n = 72,年龄在64至75岁之间)成年人对情绪化单词的记忆比较异构(混合价)和均质(单价)列表的性能。关于年龄比较,没有证据表明偏向于阳性物质的年龄偏倚。此外,老年人的记忆受基于情感的处理优先级的影响较小。尽管不支持针对情绪化单词的记忆中特定年龄的处理偏见,但发现与否定信息在某些情况下应优先处理的提议相一致。讨论了对本研究结果的概括性的可能限制(例如,对非言语材料的限制)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号