首页> 外文期刊>Psychology & marketing >Consumer Choices Under Product Option Framing: Loss Aversion Principles or Sensitivity to Price Differentials?
【24h】

Consumer Choices Under Product Option Framing: Loss Aversion Principles or Sensitivity to Price Differentials?

机译:产品期权框架下的消费者选择:损失规避原则还是对价格差异的敏感性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The effects of options framing can be theoretically explained by lossaversion principles as well as by potential alternative explanations(e.g., sensitivity to price differentials). This paper examines the inter-action effects between option framing and two types of cognitiveconstraints (availability of cognitive resources and additional redun-dant product information) on consumer choices for adding or delet-ing optional product features. In the process, the research attemptsto provide empirical support for one theoretical model (e.g., lossaversion principles) versus the other (e.g., sensitivity to price differ-entials). The results support the hypotheses that consumers choose ahigher number of product options when starting from a fully loadedmodel than from a base model, and that this effect is magnified whenconsumers make choices under high cognitive constraints. In essence,the results empirically support the theoretical premise of the effects ofoption framing being driven by loss aversion principles than by dimin-ished sensitivity to price differentials.
机译:可以通过损失规避原则以及潜在的替代性解释(例如,对价格差异的敏感性)从理论上解释期权框架的影响。本文研究了选项框架与两种类型的认知约束(认知资源的可用性和其他冗余商品信息)之间在消费者选择添加或删除可选产品功能方面的相互作用。在此过程中,研究试图为一种理论模型(例如,损失规避原则)与另一种理论模型(例如,对价格差异的敏感性)提供经验支持。结果支持以下假设:从完全加载的模型开始,消费者从基本模型中选择的产品选项数量更多;当消费者在较高的认知约束下做出选择时,这种影响会放大。从本质上讲,该结果从经验上支持了期权框架的影响的理论前提,该框架受损失规避原则驱动,而不是对价格差异的敏感性下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号