首页> 外文期刊>Quality & safety in health care >Implementation of a process-orientated multidisciplinary approach (POMA), a system of cost-effective healthcare delivery within a cardiac surgical unit.
【24h】

Implementation of a process-orientated multidisciplinary approach (POMA), a system of cost-effective healthcare delivery within a cardiac surgical unit.

机译:以过程为导向的多学科方法(POMA)的实施,这是一种在心脏外科部门内经济高效地提供医疗保健的系统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The process-orientated multidisciplinary approach (POMA) is a means of delivering consultant-led healthcare from the first outpatient clinic visit through to discharge, bringing together clinical and operational management that can result in effective resource utilisation and improved patient care. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were collected before and after the application of POMA (246 and 260 patients, respectively). The impact of POMA was analysed on the number of cancellations (NOC), postoperative clinical incidents (POCI), postoperative length of stay (PLOS) and cost in the practice of one consultant surgeon. Data were obtained from our clinical database (PATS-Dendrite), which is used risk stratify patients and prospectively to collect clinical/operative data and outcomes. RESULTS: Patients were matched for all variables except for the European Cardiac Surgical Risk Score (EuroSCORE) which was 1.93 for pre-POMA patients and 2.73 for post-POMA patients (p<0.05). Cancellations significantly decreased from 4.5% (n = 11, pre-POMA) to 0.4% (n = 1, post-POMA) (p<0.05). POCI significantly decreased from 44.3% (n = 109, pre-POMA) to 36.2% (n = 94, post-POMA) (p<0.05). PLOS significantly decreased from 6.3 (pre-POMA) to 6.1 days (post-POMA) (p = 0.002). Regression analysis showed that implementation of POMA was the only significant factor in the reduction of POCI and PLOS (p<0.05). POMA resulted in an overall saving of 285,868 pound (400,215 euro; US Dollars 508,845) calculated using the 2005 National Health Service (NHS) tariffs. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of POMA was the only significant known (or measured) factor that improved the operational efficiency and clinical outcome of a single surgeon's practice. The authors believe the principles deserve to be studied further to see if the results can be replicated.
机译:背景:以过程为导向的多学科方法(POMA)是从首次门诊就诊到出院提供顾问指导的医疗保健的一种方式,将临床和运营管理结合在一起,可以有效地利用资源并改善患者的护理。方法:前瞻性收集的数据来自于行单次隔离冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的患者在应用POMA之前和之后(分别为246例和260例)。在一名顾问外科医生的实践中,分析了POMA对取消次数(NOC),术后临床事件(POCI),术后住院时间(PLOS)和费用的影响。数据来自我们的临床数据库(PATS-Dendrite),该数据库用于对患者进行风险分层,并前瞻性地收集临床/手术数据和结果。结果:除欧洲心脏外科手术风险评分(EuroSCORE)外,所有变量均与患者匹配,该评分对于POMA前患者为1.93,POMA后患者为2.73(p <0.05)。取消幅度从4.5%(n = 11,在POMA之前)降至0.4%(n = 1,在POMA之后)(p <0.05)。 POCI显着降低,从44.3%(n = 109,POMA前)降至36.2%(n = 94,POMA后)(p <0.05)。 PLOS从6.3天(POMA前)显着降低至6.1天(POMA后)(p = 0.002)。回归分析表明,POMA的实施是降低POCI和PLOS的唯一重要因素(p <0.05)。根据2005年国家卫生局(NHS)的关税计算,POMA总共节省了285,868英镑(400,215欧元; 508,845美元)。结论:POMA的实施是唯一可提高单个手术医生执业效率和临床结果的已知(或测量)因素。作者认为应该对这些原理进行进一步研究,以查看结果是否可以复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号