...
首页> 外文期刊>Pure and Applied Chemistry >IUPAC/CITAC Guide: Selection and use of proficiency testing schemes for a limited number of participants-chemical analytical laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report)
【24h】

IUPAC/CITAC Guide: Selection and use of proficiency testing schemes for a limited number of participants-chemical analytical laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report)

机译:IUPAC / CITAC指南:为有限的参与者选择和使用能力验证计划的方法-化学分析实验室(IUPAC技术报告)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A metrological background for implementation of proficiency testing (PT) schemes for a limited number of participating laboratories (fewer than 30) is discussed. Such schemes should be based on the use of certified reference materials (CRMs) with traceable property values to serve as PT items whose composition is unknown to the participants. It is shown that achieving quality of PT results in the framework of the concept "tested once, accepted everywhere" requires both metrological comparability and compatibility of these results. The possibility of assessing collective/group performance of PT participants by comparison of the PT consensus value (mean or median of the PT results) with the certified value of the test items is analyzed. Tabulated criteria for this assessment are proposed. Practical examples are described for illustration of the issues discussed.
机译:讨论了为有限数量的参与实验室(少于30个)实施能力验证(PT)计划的计量背景。此类计划应基于使用具有可追溯特性值的认证参考材料(CRM)用作参与者不知道其成分的PT项目。结果表明,在“一次测试,到处接受”这一概念的框架内,要实现PT的质量,就需要在计量上具有可比性和兼容性。分析了通过将PT共识值(PT结果的平均值或中位数)与测试项目的认证值进行比较来评估PT参与者的集体/团体绩效的可能性。提出了用于该评估的列表标准。描述了实际示例,以说明所讨论的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号