首页> 外文期刊>Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation >Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: a national survey of practitioners.
【24h】

Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: a national survey of practitioners.

机译:失禁专家在日常实践中使用生活质量信息:全国从业人员调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To survey continence specialists (CSs) about their assessment practice including their use of quality of life (QoL) information, perceived barriers, benefits and training needs. METHODS: Cross-sectional national postal survey of 624 practicing CSs in the UK. The questionnaire included open and closed questions relating to assessment practice. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 299 (49%) CSs. Although 80% routinely assessed QoL, fewer than 54% demonstrated awareness of published questionnaires. The majority used structured questions (41%) many of which were non-standardised single items (26%) or locally developed questionnaires (19%). Only 22% used standardised patient-completed questionnaires such as the King's Health Questionnaire and the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire. Perceived assessment barriers included the availability of appropriate questionnaires, patient disability, limited guidance, resources and time. Of those routinely assessing QoL, 77% wanted more support; the most useful media cited being the internet, followed by professional guidance and training courses. CONCLUSION: Although QoL measurement is highly valued, there was wide variation in assessment practice with few adopting standardised approaches. Most CSs require greater guidance and support that takes account of their diverse needs. Familiar assessment barriers exist which the use of web-based information, in association with professional guidance might help overcome. Clear mechanisms are required to direct standardised and appropriate assessment practice.
机译:目的:调查节制专家(CS)的评估实践,包括他们对生活质量(QoL)信息的使用,感知的障碍,收益和培训需求。方法:在英国对624个实践中的CS进行横断面全国邮政调查。问卷包括与评估实践有关的开放式和封闭式问题。结果:299名CS用户返回了完整的问卷。尽管80%的人定期评估QoL,但只有不到54%的人表现出对已发布问卷的了解。大多数使用结构化问题(41%),其中许多是非标准化的单项(26%)或本地开发的问卷(19%)。只有22%的人使用了标准的患者填写的问卷,例如King's Health问卷和失禁生活质量问卷。可以理解的评估障碍包括适当的调查表的可用性,患者的残疾,有限的指导,资源和时间。在定期评估QoL的人群中,有77%希望获得更多支持。被引用的最有用的媒体是互联网,其次是专业指导和培训课程。结论:尽管QoL测量受到高度重视,但评估实践中存在很大差异,很少采用标准化方法。大多数CS需要考虑到他们的多样化需求而提供更多的指导和支持。存在熟悉的评估障碍,使用基于网络的信息以及专业指导可以帮助克服这些障碍。需要明确的机制来指导标准化和适当的评估实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号