首页> 外文期刊>Publishing research quarterly >Refereeing process in mathematics and physics: Meaningful changes and models for improvement
【24h】

Refereeing process in mathematics and physics: Meaningful changes and models for improvement

机译:数学和物理学的裁判过程:有意义的变化和改进模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Contemporary scientific publishing in mathematics and physics (as in other exact sciences) is a complex and rapidly changing process. The most important element of this process, namely, the refereeing process is considered. In particular, meaningful changes towards refereeing process in mathematics and physics are identified and predicted. Considering a transition that takes place from the traditional refereeing system to other models and introducing the four basic parameters of the refereeing process, namely, the review stage, the openness for editors, referees and authors, journals and e-journals, feedback and e-feedback, several different models are proposed and described for improving the traditional refereeing system (e.g., 2-stage open and semi-open pre-review models, 1-stage open and blind pre-review models, and 0-stage open post-review models).
机译:与数学和物理学一样,当代科学出版(与其他精确科学一样)是一个复杂且瞬息万变的过程。这个过程中最重要的元素,即裁判过程被考虑。尤其是,可以确定和预测对数学和物理裁判过程的有意义的变化。考虑从传统裁判系统到其他模型的过渡,并介绍裁判过程的四个基本参数,即审核阶段,编辑,裁判和作者,期刊和电子期刊的开放性,反馈和电子信息。反馈,提出并描述了几种不同的模型来改进传统的裁判系统(例如,两阶段公开和半公开预审模型,一阶段公开和盲前预审模型以及零阶段公开后审模型楷模)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号