...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychonomic bulletin & review >Don’t just repeat after me: Retrieval practice is better than imitation for foreign vocabulary learning
【24h】

Don’t just repeat after me: Retrieval practice is better than imitation for foreign vocabulary learning

机译:不要只是跟着我重复一遍:检索练习胜于模仿外国词汇学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Second language (L2) instruction programs often ask learners to repeat aloud words spoken by a native speaker. However, recent research on retrieval practice has suggested that imitating native pronunciation might be less effective than drill instruction, wherein the learner is required to produce the L2 words from memory (and given feedback). We contrasted the effectiveness of imitation and retrieval practice drills on learning L2 spoken vocabulary. Learners viewed pictures of objects and heard their names; in the imitation condition, they heard and then repeated aloud each name, whereas in the retrieval practice condition, they tried to produce the name before hearing it. On a final test administered either immediately after training (Exp. 1) or after a 2-day delay (Exp. 2), retrieval practice produced better comprehension of the L2 words, better ability to produce the L2 words, and no loss of pronunciation quality.
机译:第二语言(L2)指令程序经常要求学习者重复母语为母语的人说的单词。但是,有关检索实践的最新研究表明,模仿母语发音可能不如钻研指令有效,在钻研指令中,要求学习者从记忆中产生L2单词(并给出反馈)。我们对比了模仿和检索练习演练对学习L2口语词汇的有效性。学习者观看了物体的图片并听到了它们的名字。在模仿条件下,他们会听到然后大声重复每个名字,而在检索练习条件下,他们会在听到名字之前先尝试产生名字。在培训(实验1)后或延迟2天(实验2)后立即进行的最终测试中,检索练习对L2单词的理解更好,产生L2单词的能力更好,并且没有发音损失质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号