...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >The Correspondence of Daily and Retrospective PTSD Reports Among Female Victims of Sexual Assault
【24h】

The Correspondence of Daily and Retrospective PTSD Reports Among Female Victims of Sexual Assault

机译:性侵犯女性受害者每日和回顾性PTSD报告的对应关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research addressing the association between daily and retrospective symptom reports suggests that retrospective reports are typically inflated. The present study examined the association between daily posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom reports over 1 month and a corresponding retrospective report (PTSD Checklist [PCL]; Weathers et al., 1993) for both total scores and symptom clusters. The authors hypothesized that greater PTSD symptom instability and greater depression would be associated with poorer agreement between daily and retrospective reports. Data were collected from 132 female college students who were sexually assaulted. Multilevel modeling indicated very strong agreement between mean daily and retrospective reports for total scores and symptom clusters, with pseudo-R-2 ranging from .55 to .77. Depression symptoms did not moderate this association, but daily retrospective agreement was lowest for the avoidance cluster, which was also the most unstable. Finally, retrospective recall for each symptom cluster showed acceptable specificity to the corresponding daily symptom clusters. Overall, these findings suggest that retrospective memories for global PTSD symptoms and symptom clusters, as assessed by the PCL, are consistent with daily reports over a 1-month period. Implications for clinical assessment methodology are discussed.
机译:针对日常和回顾性症状报告之间关联的研究表明,回顾性报告通常会夸大。本研究检查了总创伤强度和症状群均超过1个月的每日创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状报告与相应的回顾性报告(PTSD检查表[PCL]; Weathers等,1993)之间的关系。作者假设,PTSD症状不稳定和抑郁症加剧将与每日和回顾性报告之间较差的一致性有关。从132名遭到性侵犯的女大学生那里收集了数据。多级建模表明,每日平均和回顾性报告的总分和症状群之间有非常强的一致性,伪R-2的范围从0.55到0.77。抑郁症状并不能减轻这种关联,但是对于回避群体而言,每日回顾性协议最低,也是最不稳定的。最后,回顾性回忆每个症状群对相应的每日症状群表现出可接受的特异性。总体而言,这些发现表明,PCL评估的全球PTSD症状和症状群的回顾性记忆与1个月内的每日报告一致。讨论了对临床评估方法的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号