...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychopathology >Impulsivity in borderline personality disorder: impairment in self-report measures, but not behavioral inhibition.
【24h】

Impulsivity in borderline personality disorder: impairment in self-report measures, but not behavioral inhibition.

机译:边缘性人格障碍中的冲动:自我报告措施受损,但行为抑制未受影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Impulsivity is a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, previous clinical and experimental studies investigating impulsivity in BPD rendered mixed results. In this study, impulsivity was assessed by self-report scales and behavioral inhibition tasks to compare different data levels. SAMPLING AND METHODS: Fifteen women with BPD and 15 matched healthy control subjects (HC) completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Eysenck's Impulsivity Questionnaire and the UPPS (Urgency, Lack of Perseverance, Lack of Premeditation and Sensation Seeking) scale, and participated in a Stroop task, an antisaccade task and a stop signal task. RESULTS: Patients with BPD scored significantly higher on self-report measures as compared to HC, but not in behavioral tests. In BPD patients, but not in HC, behavioral inhibition errors were correlated with more intense emotional state. CONCLUSION: We found a discrepancy between self-report and behavioral data. Further studies need to assess additional possible mechanisms underlying increased impulsivity, their relation to emotional instability, and their neurobiological underpinnings.
机译:背景:冲动性是边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的核心特征。然而,先前对BPD冲动进行研究的临床和实验研究却得出了不同的结果。在这项研究中,冲动力通过自我报告量表和行为抑制任务进行评估,以比较不同的数据水平。抽样和方法:15名BPD妇女和15名匹配的健康对照受试者(HC)完成了Barratt冲动量表,Eysenck的冲动问卷和UPPS(紧急情况,缺乏毅力,缺乏冥想和寻求感觉)量表,并参加了Stroop任务,反扫视任务和停止信号任务。结果:与HC相比,BPD患者的自我报告得分明显高于HC,但在行为测试中却没有。在BPD患者而非HC患者中,行为抑制错误与更强烈的情绪状态相关。结论:我们发现自我报告与行为数据之间存在差异。进一步的研究需要评估潜在的增加冲动的潜在机制,它们与情绪不稳定的关系以及它们的神经生物学基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号