首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Which route to recovery? Controlled retrieval and accessibility bias in retroactive interference
【24h】

Which route to recovery? Controlled retrieval and accessibility bias in retroactive interference

机译:哪条恢复路线?追溯干扰中的受控检索和可访问性偏差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

New learning often interferes with the production of older, previously learned responses. However, the original responses usually appear to spontaneously recover and regain their dominance after a delay. This article takes a new approach to questions of interference and recovery by examining performance on immediate and delayed tests using direct or indirect instructions. Direct instructions asked participants to deliberately retrieve the original responses, and indirect instructions allowed them to respond on a more automatic basis, using whatever response came to mind first. Results suggest that interference and recovery may have their largest effects via relatively automatic influences on memory, such as the accessibility of new versus original information. This finding adds a new perspective to classic theories of interference and recovery, and may also inform current understanding of performance in populations (e.g., older adults) that often rely predominantly on automatic memory processing.
机译:新的学习通常会干扰较旧的,先前学习的响应的产生。但是,原始响应通常会在延迟后似乎自发恢复并重新获得优势。本文通过使用直接或间接指令检查立即和延迟测试的性能,采用了一种新方法来解决干扰和恢复问题。直接指示要求参与者有意检索原始回复,而间接指示则允许参与者使用最先想到的任何回复以更自动的方式做出回应。结果表明,干扰和恢复可能通过相对自动地影响内存(例如,新信息与原始信息的可访问性)而受到最大影响。这一发现为经典的干扰和恢复理论增添了新的视角,也可能为当前对主要依靠自动内存处理的人群(例如,老年人)的表现提供了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号