首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >The Evaluative Advantage of Novel Alternatives: An Information-Sampling Account
【24h】

The Evaluative Advantage of Novel Alternatives: An Information-Sampling Account

机译:新型替代方案的评估优势:信息抽样账户

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

New products, services, and ideas are often evaluated more favorably than similar but older ones. Although several explanations of this phenomenon have been proposed, we identify an overlooked asymmetry in information about new and old items that emerges when people seek positive experiences and learn about the qualities of (noisy) alternatives by experiencing them. The reason for the asymmetry is that people avoid rechoosing alternatives that previously led to poor outcomes; hence, additional feedback on their qualities is precluded. Negative quality estimates, even when caused by noise, thus tend to persist. This negative bias takes time to develop, and affects old alternatives more strongly than similar but newer alternatives. We analyze a simple learning model and demonstrate the process by which people would tend to evaluate a new alternative more positively than an older alternative with the same payoff distribution. The results from two experimental studies (Ns = 769 and 805) support the predictions of our model.
机译:新产品,服务和创意通常比类似但较旧的产品更受好评。尽管已经提出了对此现象的几种解释,但我们发现当人们寻求积极的经历并通过体验来了解(嘈杂的)替代方法的质量时,有关新旧项目的信息中存在一个被忽视的不对称现象。这种不对称的原因是人们避免重新选择以前导致不良结果的替代方法。因此,排除了对其质量的其他反馈。因此,即使是由噪声引起的,负面质量估计也趋于持续。这种消极的偏见需要时间来发展,并且比类似但较新的替代方案对旧替代方案的影响更大。我们分析了一个简单的学习模型,并说明了人们倾向于比具有相同收益分布的旧替代方法更积极地评估新替代方法的过程。两项实验研究(Ns = 769和805)的结果支持了我们模型的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号