首页> 外文期刊>Psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >How Are You Feeling? Revisiting the Quantification of Emotional Qualia
【24h】

How Are You Feeling? Revisiting the Quantification of Emotional Qualia

机译:你感觉怎么样?重新审视情感定律

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Numerous emotion researchers have asked their study participants to attend to the distinct feelings of arousal and valence, and self-report and physiological data have supported the independence of the two. We examined whether this dissociation reflects introspection about distinct emotional qualia or the way in which valence is measured. With either valence (Experiment 1) or arousal (Experiment 2) as the primary focus, when valence was measured using a bipolar scale (ranging from negative to positive), it was largely dissociable from arousal. By contrast, when two separate unipolar scales of pleasant and unpleasant valence were used, their sum was equivalent to feelings of arousal and its autonomic correlates. The association (or dissociation) of valence and arousal was related to the estimation (or nonestimation) of mixed-valence experiences, which suggests that the distinction between valence and arousal may reflect less the nature of emotional experience and more how it is measured. These findings further encourage use of unipolar valence scales in psychological measurement.
机译:众多情绪研究人员要求他们的研究参与者关注唤醒和效价的独特感觉,而自我报告和生理数据支持了两者的独立性。我们检查了这种分离是否反映出对独特情感品质的内省或对价的测量方式。以化合价(实验1)或唤醒(实验2)为主要焦点,当使用双极量表(从负到正)测量化合价时,它与唤醒之间的关系很大。相比之下,当使用两个单独的单极性量表的愉快和不愉快的价时,它们的总和就相当于唤醒的感觉和它的自主性相关。价与唤醒的关联(或分离)与混合价经历的估计(或无刺激)有关,这表明价与唤醒之间的区别可能较少反映情感体验的性质,而更多地反映了情感体验的测量方式。这些发现进一步鼓励在心理测量中使用单极化合价表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号