...
首页> 外文期刊>Public health >Thinking outside the box: Aboriginal people's suggestions for conducting health studies with Aboriginal communities.
【24h】

Thinking outside the box: Aboriginal people's suggestions for conducting health studies with Aboriginal communities.

机译:跳出框框思考:原住民对与原住民社区进行健康研究的建议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Aboriginal people are under-represented in epidemiological research, largely due to past failures to engage and recruit Aboriginal communities, research fatigue and the use of culturally inappropriate methods. A qualitative study was undertaken in rural and urban Aboriginal communities in north-eastern and south-western Ontario to identify culturally congruent public health research methodologies. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative participatory research study using focus group discussions. METHODS: This study employed a participatory research framework to elicit methodological suggestions for conducting public health research with Aboriginal communities during focus groups with healthcare providers from six diverse Aboriginal health organizations in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: Continuing requests for participation in health research studies have led to community exhaustion. Discussions explored appropriate methods to obtain community approval and support for a study, the need for cultural sensitivity training for researchers, the value of conducting studies of interest and benefit to the community, advantages and disadvantages of qualitative and quantitative studies, the benefit of both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal ethics reviews, the importance of safeguarding trusted information, types of incentives that may enhance study participation, suggestions to improve the collection of questionnaire information and biological specimens, how to resolve contentious issues and dissemination of study results. CONCLUSION: In order to successfully engage Aboriginal people in health studies, researchers need to build rapport with communities, have a community presence, be respectful and collaborative, utilize incentives, and employ flexible and adaptive methodologies of reasonable length. Oral interviews are preferred to self-completed information. The use of more mixed methods methodologies was suggested when quantitative data collection is necessary. Communities expect presentations about research findings.
机译:目的:原住民在流行病学研究中的代表性不足,这主要是由于过去未能参与和招募原住民社区,研究疲劳以及使用文化上不合适的方法所致。在安大略省东北部和西南部的农村和城市原住民社区进行了定性研究,以确定文化上一致的公共卫生研究方法。研究设计:使用焦点小组讨论的定性参与研究。方法:本研究采用参与性研究框架,从加拿大安大略省六个不同的原住民卫生组织的医疗保健提供者的焦点小组中,与原住民社区进行公共卫生研究,提出了方法学建议。结果:持续参与健康研究的要求导致了社区的疲惫。讨论探讨了获得社区认可和支持的研究的适当方法,对研究人员进行文化敏感性培训的必要性,进行对社区有益和有益的研究的价值,定性和定量研究的利弊以及原住民的利益非原住民道德审查,维护可信赖信息的重要性,可增强研究参与度的激励措施的类型,改善问卷信息和生物学标本收集的建议,如何解决有争议的问题和传播研究结果的建议。结论:为了成功地使土著人民参与健康研究,研究人员需要与社区建立融洽的关系,拥有社区形象,相互尊重和合作,利用激励措施,并采用合理长度的灵活和适应性方法。口头访谈优先于自我完成的信息。当需要定量数据收集时,建议使用更多的混合方法。社区期望发表有关研究结果的演讲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号