首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Physical Geography >Adequacies and deficiencies of alpine and subalpine treeline studies in the national parks of the western USA
【24h】

Adequacies and deficiencies of alpine and subalpine treeline studies in the national parks of the western USA

机译:美国西部国家公园中高山和亚高山树线研究的充分性和不足之处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To mitigate the impact of direct human activity on treeline pattern and process, much alpine treeline research in the western USA has been conducted in nationally protected areas. The use of treeline as a proxy for climate change has been assessed in parks throughout the west but often at the expense of geology or geomorphology as controls of treeline variation. The dissimilar geology and geomorphic processes of the western national parks suggest that treeline may respond differently between national parks when subjected to disturbance. Therefore, predicted vegetation response to disturbance across the western USA may provide a limited assessment of change beyond fine-scale analysis due to data collection from a limited number of national parks containing alpine treeline. We performed a content analysis on previous research that examined alpine treeline in national parks and classified each treeline study as anthropogenic, orographic/edaphic, or climatic according to the primary factor attributed to treeline control. Results indicated that the three types of treeline are not uniformly studied. Climatic treeline is most commonly studied whereas anthropogenic and orographic/edaphic studies are often lacking. Furthermore, several western national parks are entirely devoid of anthropogenic and orographic treeline research. Similar findings exist for treeline studies in protected places worldwide. More research in protected places is required to broaden our understanding of multiple treeline processes across both regional and worldwide extents.
机译:为了减轻人类直接活动对树线形态和过程的影响,美国西部的许多高山树线研究已在国家保护区进行。在整个西部的公园中,都已评估了使用树线作为气候变化的替代品,但通常以牺牲地质或地貌为代价来控制树线变化。西部国家公园的地质和地貌过程不同,这表明在受到干扰时,树线在国家公园之间的反应可能有所不同。因此,由于从有限数量的包含高山林线的国家公园收集数据,美国西部整个地区对扰动的预测植被响应可能无法提供对变化的有限评估,而无法进行精细分析。我们对先前的研究进行了内容分析,该研究对国家公园中的高山林线进行了检查,并根据归因于林线控制的主要因素将每个林线研究分类为人为,地形/水生或气候。结果表明,对三种类型的树线没有进行统一研究。气候树线是最常用的研究方法,而人为和地形/水文研究则经常缺乏。此外,一些西方国家公园完全没有人为和地形学方面的研究。在全球保护区的树线研究中也有类似的发现。需要对保护区进行更多研究,以拓宽我们对区域和全球范围内多个树线过程的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号