首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Royal Society. Mathematical, physical and engineering sciences >Elastic waves in Timoshenko beams: the 'lost and found' of an eigenmode
【24h】

Elastic waves in Timoshenko beams: the 'lost and found' of an eigenmode

机译:季莫申科光束中的弹性波:本征模的“迷失与发现”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper considers propagating waves in elastic bars in the spirit of asymptotic analysis and shows that the inclusion of shear deformation amounts to singular perturbation in the Euler Bernoulli (EB)field equation. We show that Timoshenko, in his classic work of 1921, incorrectly treated the problem as one of regular perturbation and missed out one physically meaningful 'branch' of the dispersion curve (spectrum), which is mainly shear-wise polarized. Singular perturbation leads to: (i) Timoshenko's solution omega((1))* similar to omega(EB)*[1+O(epsilon(2)kappa*(2))] and (ii) a singular solution omega((2))* similar to (1/2 epsilon(2)) + O(kappa*)(2); epsilon, omega* and kappa* are the non-dimensional slenderness, frequency and wavenumber, respectively. Asymptotic formulae for dispersion, standing waves and the density of modes are given in terms of e. The second spectrum in the light of the debate on its existence, or not is discussed. A previously proposed Lagrangian is shown to be inadmissible in the context. We point out that Lagrangian densities that lead to the same equation(s) of motion may not be equivalent for field problems: careful consideration to the kinetic boundary conditions is important. A Hamiltonian formulation is presented the conclusions regarding the validity (or not) of Lagrangian densities are confirmed via the constants of motion.
机译:本文根据渐近分析的精神考虑了弹性杆中的传播波,并表明在Euler Bernoulli(EB)场方程中,剪切变形的包含等于奇异摄动。我们证明,季莫申科在1921年的经典著作中错误地将问题视为常规扰动之一,并且错过了色散曲线(光谱)的一个物理上有意义的“分支”,该分支主要是剪切极化的。奇异摄动导致:(i)类似于omega(EB)* [1 + O(epsilon(2)kappa *(2))]的Timoshenko解omega((1))*和(ii)omega(( 2))*类似于(1/2 epsilon(2))+ O(kappa *)(2); epsilon,ω*和kappa *分别是无量纲的细长度,频率和波数。色散,驻波和模式密度的渐近公式以e表示。根据有关其存在与否的辩论,讨论了第二个光谱。在上下文中,先前提出的拉格朗日法被证明是不可接受的。我们指出,导致相同运动方程的拉格朗日密度可能不适用于磁场问题:仔细考虑动力学边界条件很重要。提出了哈密顿公式,关于拉格朗日密度的有效性(或无效)的结论通过运动常数得到证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号