...
首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital and disaster medicine : >The evaluation of research methods during disaster exercises: Applicability for improving disaster health management
【24h】

The evaluation of research methods during disaster exercises: Applicability for improving disaster health management

机译:灾害演习中研究方法的评估:改进灾害健康管理的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The objective of this study was to investigate whether disaster exercises can be used as a proxy environment to evaluate potential research instruments designed to study the application of medical care management resources during a disaster. Methods: During an 06 April 2005 Ministerial-level exercise in the Netherlands, three functional areas of patient contact were assessed: (1) Command and Control, through the application of an existing incident management system questionnaire; (2) patient flow and quality of patient distribution, through registration of data from prehospital casualty collection points, ambulances, and participating trauma centers (with inclusion of data in a flow chart); and (3) hospital coping capacity, through timed registration reports from participating trauma centers. Results: The existing incident management system questionnaire used for evaluating Command and Control during a disaster exercise would benefit from minor adaptations and validation that could not be anticipated in the exercise planning stage. Patient flow and the quality of patient distribution could not be studied during the exercise because of inconsistencies among data, and lack of data from various collection points. Coping capacity was better measured by using 10-minute rather than one hour time intervals, but provided little information regarding bottlenecks in surge capacity. Conclusion: Research instruments can be evaluated and improved when tested during a disaster exercise. Lack of data recovery hampers disaster research even in the artificial setting of a national disaster exercise. Providers at every level must be aware that proper data collection is essential to improve the quality of health care during a disaster, and that predisaster cooperation is crucial to validate patient outcomes. These problems must be addressed pre-exercise by stakeholders and decision-makers during planning, education, and training. If not, disaster exercises will not meet their full potential.
机译:简介:本研究的目的是调查灾难演习是否可以用作替代环境,以评估旨在研究灾难期间医疗管理资源的应用的潜在研究工具。方法:在2005年4月6日的荷兰部长级演习中,评估了患者接触的三个功能区域:(1)通过应用现有的事件管理系统问卷调查进行指挥和控制; (2)通过登记来自院前伤亡收集点,救护车和参与的创伤中心的数据(在流程图中包括数据)来记录病人的流量和病人的分布质量; (3)医院的应对能力,通过参与的创伤中心的定时登记报告。结果:在灾难演习中用于评估指挥与控制的现有事件管理系统调查表将受益于在演习计划阶段无法预料的微小调整和验证。由于数据之间的不一致以及缺乏来自各个收集点的数据,因此在运动期间无法研究患者流量和患者分布质量。通过使用10分钟而不是1小时的时间间隔可以更好地衡量应对能力,但很少提供有关浪涌能力瓶颈的信息。结论:在灾难演习中进行测试时,可以评估和改进研究工具。即使在国家灾难演习的人为环境中,缺乏数据恢复也会妨碍灾难研究。各个级别的提供商都必须意识到,正确的数据收集对于提高灾难发生期间的医疗质量至关重要,而灾前合作对于验证患者的结局至关重要。在计划,教育和培训期间,利益相关者和决策者必须在运动前解决这些问题。否则,灾难演习将无法充分发挥其潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号