首页> 外文期刊>Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory >Gender differences among general practitioners in smoking cessation counseling practices.
【24h】

Gender differences among general practitioners in smoking cessation counseling practices.

机译:全科医生在戒烟咨询实践中的性别差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To describe gender differences in smoking cessation counseling practices among general practitioners (GPs), and to investigate the association between training for cessation counseling and counseling practices according to gender. METHODS: Data were collected in two cross-sectional mail surveys conducted in independent random samples of GPs in Montreal, the first in 1998, and the second in 2000. RESULTS: Respondents included 653 GPs (71% of 916 eligible). All indicators of smoking cessation counseling practices were more favorable among female GPs. Higher proportions of female GPs had received training (28% vs. 17%, p=0.002), and were aware of mailed print educational materials related to cessation counseling (81% vs. 57%, p<0.0001). Training among male GPs was associated with higher scores for ascertainment of smoking status (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval)=1.69 (0.97, 2.96)), provision of advice (OR=2.20 (1.23, 3.95)), and provision of adjunct support (OR=2.86 (1.58, 5.16)). Training was not associated with counseling practices among female GPs. CONCLUSIONS: Female GPs may not benefit from formal cessation counseling training to the same extent as male GPs, possibly because they read and integrate the content of (easily available) print educational materials into their clinical practice to a greater extent than male GPs. The gender-specific impact of print educational material and formal training on cessation counseling should be evaluated among GPs.
机译:目的:描述全科医生(GPs)在戒烟咨询实践中的性别差异,并调查戒烟咨询培训与根据性别进行咨询实践之间的关联。方法:数据是在蒙特利尔的GP的独立随机样本中进行的两次横断面邮件调查收集的,第一次是1998年,第二次是2000年。结果:受访者包括653名GP(占916名合格者的71%)。女性全科医生对戒烟咨询实践的所有指标均较为满意。较高比例的女性全科医生接受了培训(28%比17%,p = 0.002),并且知道与戒毒咨询有关的邮寄印刷教育材料(81%比57%,p <0.0001)。男性全科医生中的培训与确定吸烟状况的得分更高相关(比值比(OR)(95%置信区间)= 1.69(0.97,2.96)),提供建议(OR = 2.20(1.23,3.95))和提供辅助支持(OR = 2.86(1.58,5.16))。培训与女性全科医生的咨询实践无关。结论:女性全科医生可能不会像男性全科医生那样从正式的戒烟咨询培训中受益,这可能是因为她们比男性全科医生更广泛地阅读(并将易于获得的)印刷教育材料的内容纳入其临床实践。在全科医生中,应评估印刷教育材料和正式培训对戒烟咨询服务的性别影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号