首页> 外文期刊>Platelets >Comparison between a new platelet count drop method PL-11, light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow aspirin system and thromboelastography for monitoring short-term aspirin effects in healthy individuals
【24h】

Comparison between a new platelet count drop method PL-11, light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow aspirin system and thromboelastography for monitoring short-term aspirin effects in healthy individuals

机译:新型血小板计数下降法PL-11,透光聚集法,VerifyNow阿司匹林系统和血栓弹力描记法(用于监测健康个体的短期阿司匹林效果)之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Platelet function has been described by many laboratory assays, and PL-11 is a new point-of-care platelet function analyzer based on platelet count drop method, which counts platelet before and after the addition of agonists in the citrated whole blood samples. The present study sought to compare PL-11 with other three major more established assays, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow (TM) aspirin system and thromboelastography (TEG), for monitoring the short-term aspirin responses in healthy individuals. Ten healthy young men took 100 mg/d aspirin for 3-day treatment. Platelet function was measured via PL-11, LTA, VerifyNow and TEG, respectively. The blood samples were collected at baseline, 2 hour, 1 day during the aspirin treatment and 1 day, 5 +/- 1 days, 8 +/- 1 days after the aspirin withdrawal. Moreover, 90 additional healthy subjects were recruited to establish a reference range for PL-11. Platelet function of healthy subjects decreased significantly 2 hours after 100 mg/d aspirin intake and began to recover during 4-6 days after the aspirin withdrawal. Correlations between methods were PL-11 vs. LTA (r = 0.614, p < 0.01); PL-11 vs. VerifyNow (r = 0.829, p < 0.01); PL-11 vs. TEG (r = 0.697, p < 0.001). There was no significant bias between PL-11 and LTA at baseline (bias = 1.94%, p = 0.804) using Bland-Altman analysis, while the data of PL-11 were significantly higher than LTA (bias = 24.02%, p < 0.001) during the aspirin therapy. The reference range for PL-11 in healthy young individuals was from 66.8 to 90.5% (95%CI). When aspirin low-responsiveness was defined as LTA > 20%, the cut-off values for each method were, respectively: PL-11 > 50%, VerifyNow > 533 ARU, TEG > 60.2%. The results of different platelet function assays were uninterchangeable for monitoring aspirin response and correlations among them were also varied. Correlations among PL-11 and other three major assays suggested the ability of PL-11 to assess the treatment effects of aspirin. But a large cohort study is needed to confirm the cut-off value of aspirin response detected by PL-11.
机译:血小板功能已被许多实验室测定所描述,PL-11是一种基于血小板计数下降法的新型即时护理血小板功能分析仪,可在柠檬酸化全血样品中添加激动剂前后对血小板进行计数。本研究试图将PL-11与其他三个更成熟的主要测定方法进行比较,以检测健康个体的短期阿司匹林反应,该测定法包括透光聚集法(LTA),VerifyNow(TM)阿司匹林系统和血栓弹性成像(TEG)。十名健康的年轻人服用100毫克/天的阿司匹林进行3天治疗。分别通过PL-11,LTA,VerifyNow和TEG测量血小板功能。在阿司匹林治疗期间的基线,2小时,1天和停用阿司匹林后的1天,5 +/- 1天,8 +/- 1天收集血液样本。此外,招募了另外90名健康受试者以建立PL-11的参考范围。健康受试者的血小板功能在摄入100 mg / d阿司匹林后2小时显着下降,并在阿司匹林戒断后4-6天开始恢复。方法之间的相关性是PL-11 vs.LTA(r = 0.614,p <0.01); PL-11 vs.VerifyNow(r = 0.829,p <0.01); PL-11 vs.TEG(r = 0.697,p <0.001)。使用Bland-Altman分析,基线时PL-11和LTA之间没有显着偏差(偏差= 1.94%,p = 0.804),而PL-11的数据显着高于LTA(偏差= 24.02%,p <0.001) )在阿司匹林治疗期间。健康的年轻人中PL-11的参考范围是66.8至90.5%(95%CI)。当阿司匹林低反应性定义为LTA> 20%时,每种方法的临界值分别为:PL-11> 50%,VerifyNow> 533 ARU,TEG> 60.2%。用于监测阿司匹林反应的不同血小板功能测定的结果不可互换,并且它们之间的相关性也各不相同。 PL-11与其他三项主要检测方法之间的相关性表明,PL-11能够评估阿司匹林的治疗效果。但是,需要进行大规模的队列研究来确认PL-11检测到的阿司匹林反应的临界值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号