首页> 外文期刊>Primary health care research & development >A content analysis of the Meaningful Use clinical summary: do clinical summaries promote patient engagement?
【24h】

A content analysis of the Meaningful Use clinical summary: do clinical summaries promote patient engagement?

机译:对有意义使用临床摘要的内容分析:临床摘要是否可以促进患者参与?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ten CS were accessed from each of 10 family physicians during a regular practice week. Directed content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the summaries. Key variables of analysis included diagnoses, medications, plan of care content, availability, completeness, health literacy, format, and readability. Findings CS contained an average of 5.2 diagnoses and 10 medications. Summaries contained vital signs (98%), lab results (9%), smoking status (88%), professional care team members (4%), follow-up appointments (46%), and POC (67%); 37% of CS were judged to be incomplete. Readability scores indicated that a university education was required to understand the CS. CS support patient engagement by supplying information that supports behavior change and self-management, however barriers to patient engagement exist, including (a) access, (b) poor document readability, and
机译:在常规的一周内,从10位家庭医生中分别获得10位CS。定向内容分析和描述性统计用于评估摘要。分析的关键变量包括诊断,药物,护理计划,可用性,完整性,健康素养,格式和可读性。结果CS平均包含5.2项诊断和10种药物。摘要包含生命体征(98%),化验结果(9%),吸烟状况(88%),专业护理团队成员(4%),随访预约(46%)和POC(67%); 37%的CS被认为是不完整的。可读性得分表明,需要大学教育才能理解CS。 CS通过提供支持行为改变和自我管理的信息来支持患者参与,但是患者参与存在障碍,包括(a)访问,(b)文档可读性差,以及

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号