首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >The location and incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Georgia: implications for placement of automated external defibrillators.
【24h】

The location and incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Georgia: implications for placement of automated external defibrillators.

机译:乔治亚州院外心脏骤停的位置和发生率:对自动体外除颤器放置的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies of automated external defrillator placement strategies for public access defibrillation (PAD) have addressed only the venue of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) in large urban areas. This study evaluates the relationship between population density and the incidence and location of OOHCA. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 624,199 Georgia state emergency medical services patient care reports (PCRs) in 2000. The PCR categorized these cardiac arrests by county into 12 location options. Counties were divided into population densities of <100, 100-400, 400-1,000, and >1,000 persons per square mile. The incidence of cardiac arrest for each location type was calculated for each population density group. RESULTS: The <100 density group had only 21.77% of the state's population but 30.96% of the state's cardiac arrests, whereas the >1,000 density group had 35.46% of the population but only 23.55% of the cardiac arrests (p<0.0001). The relative risk (95% confidence interval) for OOHCA in the <100 density group compared with the >1,000 density group was 2.14 (2.00, 2.29). The percentage of OOHCAs that occurred in the home for each population density group was: <100 persons per square mile, (67.67%); 100-400 persons per square mile, (68.83%); 400-1,000 persons per square mile, (65.75%); and >1,000 persons per square mile (62.09%) (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There are variations in incidence and location of OOHCA based on population density in Georgia. As population density increases, the incidence percentage of OOHCAs decreases. However, as population density increases, there is an increase in the percentage of cardiac arrests occurring outside the home, where more OOHCAs could potentially benefit from PAD.
机译:目的:先前针对公共除颤(PAD)的自动体外除颤器放置策略的研究仅解决了大城市地区的院外心脏骤停(OOHCA)的问题。这项研究评估人口密度与OOHCA发生率和位置之间的关系。方法:本研究是对2000年624,199例佐治亚州紧急医疗服务患者护理报告(PCR)的回顾性分析。PCR将这些心脏骤停按县分类为12个位置选择。各县分为每平方英里<100、100-400、400-1,000和> 1,000人的人口密度。对于每个人口密度组,计算每种位置类型的心脏骤停发生率。结果:<100密度组仅占该州人口的21.77%,但占该州心跳的30.96%;而> 1,000密度组仅占该州人口的35.46%,但仅占23.55%(p <0.0001)。 <100密度组与> 1,000密度组相比,OOHCA的相对风险(95%置信区间)为2.14(2.00,2.29)。每个人口密度组在家中发生的OOHCA的百分比是:<100人/平方英里,(67.67%);每平方英里100-400人(68.83%);每平方英里400-1,000人(65.75%);每平方英里> 1,000人(62.09%)(p = 0.0001)。结论:基于乔治亚州的人口密度,OOHCA的发生率和位置存在差异。随着人口密度的增加,OOHCA的发病率会降低。但是,随着人口密度的增加,在家外发生心脏骤停的百分比也增加了,在这种情况下,更多的OOHCA可能会从PAD中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号