首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Few emergency medical services patients with lower-extremity fractures receive prehospital analgesia.
【24h】

Few emergency medical services patients with lower-extremity fractures receive prehospital analgesia.

机译:下肢骨折的急诊医疗服务很少接受院前镇痛。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous literature has identified prehospital pain management as an important emergency medical services (EMS) function, and few patients transported by EMS with musculoskeletal injuries receive prehospital analgesia (PA). OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe the frequency with which EMS patients with lower-extremity and hip fracture receive prehospital and emergency department (ED) analgesia; 2) to describe EMS and patient factors that may affect administration of PA to these patients; and 3) to describe the time interval between EMS and ED medication administrations. METHODS: This was a four-month (April to July 2000) retrospective study of patients with a final hospital diagnosis of hip or lower-extremity fracture who were transported by EMS to a single suburban community hospital. Data including patient demographics, fracture type, EMS response, and treatment characteristics were abstracted from review of EMS and ED records. Patients who had ankle fractures, had multiple traumatic injuries, were under the age of 18 years, or did not have fractures were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. A basic life support (BLS)-only response was provided to 20 (16.0%). Another 38 (38.4%) received an advanced life support (ALS) response and were triaged to BLS transport. Of all the patients, 22 (18.3%) received PA. Patients who received PA were younger (64.0 vs. 77.3 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a lower-extremity fracture other than a hip fracture (31.8% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.004). Of all patients, 113 (91.1%) received ED analgesia. Patients received analgesia from EMS almost 2.0 hours sooner that in the ED (mean 28.4 +/- 36 min vs. 146 +/- 74 min after EMS scene arrival, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A minority of the study group received PA. Older patients and patients with hip fracture are less likely to receive PA. It is unclear whether current EMS system design may adversely impact administration of PA. Further work is needed to clarify whether patient need or EMS practice patterns result in low rates of PA.
机译:以前的文献已经将院前疼痛管理确定为重要的紧急医疗服务(EMS)功能,并且经EMS运送的具有肌肉骨骼损伤的患者很少接受院前镇痛(PA)。目的:1)描述下肢和髋部骨折的EMS患者接受院前急诊镇痛的频率; 2)描述EMS和可能影响这些患者使用PA的患者因素;和3)描述EMS和ED药物管理之间的时间间隔。方法:这是一项为期四个月(2000年4月至2000年7月)的回顾性研究,研究对象是经EMS运送到一家郊区社区医院的最终医院诊断为髋部或下肢骨折的患者。包括患者人口统计,骨折类型,EMS反应和治疗特征在内的数据是从EMS和ED记录的审查中抽象出来的。患有踝部骨折,多处创伤,年龄在18岁以下或没有骨折的患者被排除在外。结果:124名患者符合入选标准。仅针对基本生活支持(BLS)的响应提供给20(16.0%)。另有38名(38.4%)接受了高级生命支持(ALS)反应,并被分类为BLS运输。在所有患者中,有22名(18.3%)接受了PA。接受PA的患者较年轻(64.0 vs. 77.3岁,p <0.001),并且更有可能发生下肢骨折而不是髋部骨折(31.8%vs. 10.7%,p <0.004)。在所有患者中,有113例(91.1%)接受了ED镇痛。患者在急诊室接受EMS镇痛的时间比在急诊室快2.0个小时(平均28.4 +/- 36分钟对EMS现场到达后的146 +/- 74分钟,p <0.001)。结论:研究组中的少数人接受了PA。老年患者和髋部骨折患者接受PA的可能性较小。目前尚不清楚当前的EMS系统设计是否会对PA的管理产生不利影响。需要进一步的工作来阐明患者的需求或EMS的实践模式是否会导致PA发生率低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号