首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Physiologic field triage criteria for identifying seriously injured older adults
【24h】

Physiologic field triage criteria for identifying seriously injured older adults

机译:识别严重受伤老年人的生理场分类标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. To evaluate the ability of out-of-hospital physiologic measures to predict serious injury for field triage purposes among older adults and potentially reduce the undertriage of seriously injured elders to non-trauma hospitals.Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study involving injured adults 55 years and older transported by 94 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies to 122 hospitals (trauma and non-trauma) in 7 regions of the western United States from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008. We evaluated initial out-of-hospital Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, systolic blood pressure (SBP), respiratory rate, heart rate, shock index (SBP ÷ heart rate), out-of-hospital procedures, mechanism of injury, and patient demographics. The primary outcome was "serious injury," defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16, as a measure of trauma center need. We used multivariable regression models, fractional polynomials and binary recursive partitioning to evaluate appropriate physiologic cut-points and the value of different physiologic triage criteria.Results. A total of 44,890 injured older adults were evaluated and transported by EMS, of whom 2,328 (5.2%) had ISS ≥ 16. Nonlinear associations existed between all physiologic measures and ISS ≥ 16 (unadjusted and adjusted p ≤ 0.001 for all,), except for heart rate (adjusted p = 0.48). Revised physiologic triage criteria included GCS score ≤ 14; respiratory rate < 10 or > 24 breaths per minute or assisted ventilation; and SBP < 110 or > 200 mmHg. Compared to current triage practices, the revised criteria would increase triage sensitivity from 78.6 to 86.3% (difference 7.7%, 95% CI 6.1-9.6%), reduce specificity from 75.5 to 60.7% (difference 14.8%, 95% CI 14.3-15.3%), and increase the proportion of patients without serious injuries transported to major trauma centers by 60%.Conclusions. Existing out-of-hospital physiologic triage criteria could be revised to better identify seriously injured older adults at the expense of increasing overtriage to major trauma centers.
机译:目的。评估院外生理措施来预测老年人在现场进行分流的严重伤害的能力,并可能减少严重受伤的老年人到非创伤医院的未足月龄。这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是从2006年1月1日至12月31日,由94个紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构将55岁及以上的受伤成年人运送到美国西部7个地区的122家医院(创伤和非创伤), 2008年。我们评估了最初的院外格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分,收缩压(SBP),呼吸频率,心率,休克指数(SBP÷心率),院外手术程序,损伤机制以及患者的受众特征。主要结果是“严重损伤”,定义为损伤严重度评分(ISS)≥16,是衡量创伤中心需求的标准。我们使用多元回归模型,分数多项式和二元递归分区来评估适当的生理切点和不同生理分类标准的价值。 EMS对总共44,890名受伤的老年人进行了评估和运输,其中2,328(5.2%)的ISS≥16。所有生理指标与ISS≥16之间存在非线性关联(未经调整和调整后的p均≤0.001,除外)心率(调整后的p = 0.48)。修订后的生理分类标准包括GCS评分≤14;每分钟<10或> 24次呼吸或辅助通气的呼吸频率; SBP <110或> 200 mmHg。与目前的分类方法相比,修订后的标准将分类灵敏度从78.6提高到86.3%(差异7.7%,95%CI 6.1-9.6%),特异性从75.5降低到60.7%(差异14.8%,95%CI 14.3-15.3) %),并且将没有严重伤害的患者转移到主要创伤中心的比例增加了60%。可以修改现有的院外生理分类标准,以更好地识别受重伤的老年人,但要增加对严重创伤中心的过度分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号