首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >Do infants less than 12 months of age with an apparent life-threatening event need transport to a pediatric critical care center?
【24h】

Do infants less than 12 months of age with an apparent life-threatening event need transport to a pediatric critical care center?

机译:出现明显威胁生命的事件的小于12个月的婴儿是否需要转运到儿科重症监护中心?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background. Some emergency medical services (EMS) systems transport infants with an apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) directly to hospitals capable of pediatric critical care (PCC) monitoring. Objective. To describe factors identifiable by EMS providers that distinguish ALTE patients who may require PCC monitoring and management. Methods. This was an observational analysis of ALTE patients who were transported by EMS and presented to four emergency departments (EDs). ED data were prospectively collected. Hospital records or reports from contacted parents were reviewed for interventions that mandated PCC management. We defined a priori the criteria by which PCC monitoring and management were required: if the subject needed 1) airway intervention with bag-valve-mask ventilation or advanced airway (e.g., endotracheal intubation) in the field, ED, or pediatric intensive care unit (PICU); 2) administration of vasopressors; 3) invasive monitoring; 4) surgery during the hospitalization; or 5) subspecialty consultation. Univariate analysis was performed to describe factors associated with requiring PCC management, and a multivariable model, accounting for within-hospital correlations, was developed. Results. A total of 513 patients were enrolled. Of these, 51 (9.9%) had an intervention warranting PCC management. Univariate predictors for requiring PCC management included prematurity, past medical history, resuscitation attempt, upper respiratory infection, apnea, previous ALTE, more than one ALTE in 24 hours, and cyanosis. The multivariable model yielded the following independent predictors for requiring PCC management: resuscitation attempt before EMS arrival, cyanosis, and more than one ALTE in 24 hours. This model demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.3%, a specificity of 25.8%, a negative predictive value of 98.3%, and a positive predictive value of 13.5%. Conclusion. Only 9.9% of infants presenting in the field with ALTE had an intervention warranting PCC management, suggesting that many ALTE patients may be safely transported to hospitals without PCC capability. This would allow for better resource utilization of specialty care hospitals and still provide an option for secondary transports for those few patients not correctly identified in the field as requiring PCC. History of resuscitation attempt, cyanosis, and more than one ALTE in 24 hours are independent risk factors for requiring PCC management.
机译:背景。一些紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统将有明显生命危险事件(ALTE)的婴儿直接运送到能够进行儿科重症监护(PCC)监控的医院。目的。描述由EMS提供商识别的可能区分可能需要PCC监视和管理的ALTE患者的因素。方法。这是对由EMS运送并提交给四个急诊科(ED)的ALTE患者的观察性分析。 ED数据是前瞻性收集的。审查了与父母接触的医院记录或报告,以进行强制性PCC管理的干预措施。我们事先定义了需要进行PCC监测和管理的标准:如果受试者需要1)在野外,急诊室或小儿重症监护室进行气袋插口式面罩通气或先进气道(例如气管插管)进行气道干预(PICU); 2)血管加压药的给药; 3)侵入性监测; 4)住院期间手术;或5)专科咨询。进行单变量分析以描述与需要PCC管理相关的因素,并开发了一个多变量模型,该模型说明了医院内的相关性。结果。共有513名患者入组。其中,有51名(9.9%)进行了需要PCC管理的干预。需要进行PCC管理的单因素预测因素包括早产,既往病史,复苏尝试,上呼吸道感染,呼吸暂停,先前的ALTE,24小时内超过一项ALTE以及发。多变量模型得出以下需要PCC管理的独立预测因素:EMS到达之前进行的复苏尝试,发cyan和24小时内超过一个ALTE。该模型显示出96.3%的敏感性,25.8%的特异性,98.3%的阴性预测值和13.5%的阳性预测值。结论。在现场使用ALTE的婴儿中,只有9.9%的患者需要进行PCC管理干预,这表明许多ALTE患者可以安全地转移到没有PCC能力的医院。这样可以更好地利用专科医院的资源,并且仍然为那些在现场未正确识别为需要PCC的少数患者提供了二次转运的选择。复苏尝试,发和24小时内超过一次ALTE的历史是需要PCC管理的独立风险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号