首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital emergency care >A comparison of proximal tibia, distal femur, and proximal humerus infusion rates using the EZ-IO intraosseous device on the adult swine (Sus scrofa) model
【24h】

A comparison of proximal tibia, distal femur, and proximal humerus infusion rates using the EZ-IO intraosseous device on the adult swine (Sus scrofa) model

机译:在成年猪(Sus scrofa)模型上使用EZ-IO骨内装置比较胫骨近端,股骨远端和肱骨近端输注速率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. We sought to compare the flow rates of the proximal tibia, the distal femur, and the proximal humerus using high pressure (greater than 300 mmHg) through an intraosseous (IO) infusion needle in an adult swine model. Methods. We performed a prospective interventional study in 11 swine. After placement of central vein and arterial lines, blood was removed via the central line until the animal's mean arterial pressure decreased 25% from the recorded baseline. We inserted a 25-mm IO needle into the proximal tibia and 45-mm needles into the distal femur and proximal humerus. All extremities were utilized in each study animal. We infused normal saline at each site for 10 minutes with a pressure bag inflated to the highest achievable pressure (greater than 300 mmHg) as measured at the infusion site with a calibrated portable inline pressure gauge. We measured the volume of normal saline remaining and we calculated infusion rates for each site. We then compared infusion flow rates between the three locations. Statistical analysis and comparison of the infusion rates of all three study arms were as performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. The average weight of the swine was 71 kg (range 64-84 kg). Successful placement of the IO needle was confirmed at all three sites. The mean infusion flow rate was 213 mL/min (standard deviation [SD] 53.2 mL/min) for the proximal humerus, 138 mL/min (SD 65.3 mL/min) for the distal femur, and 103 mL/min (SD 48.1 mL/min) for the proximal tibia (p < 0.001). The flow rate through the proximal humerus was statistically greater than that for the proximal tibia and the distal femur (p < 0.001). The flow rates through the proximal tibia and distal femur were similar. Conclusion. The humerus is a suitable alternative site for IO placement, with a potential for higher flow rates than the proximal tibia and distal femur when resuscitating a patient.
机译:目的。我们试图通过成年猪模型中的骨内(IO)输注针使用高压(大于300 mmHg)比较胫骨近端,股骨远端和肱骨近端的流速。方法。我们对11头猪进行了前瞻性干预研究。放置中心静脉和动脉线后,通过中心线除去血液,直到动物的平均动脉压从记录的基线下降25%为止。我们将25毫米IO针插入胫骨近端,并将45毫米IO针插入股骨远端和肱骨近端。所有肢体均用于每只研究动物。我们在每个部位注入生理盐水10分钟,用一个压力袋充气,压力袋充气至可达到的最高压力(大于300 mmHg),该压力是在输注部位使用校准的便携式在线压力计测得的。我们测量了剩余生理盐水的量,并计算了每个部位的输注速度。然后,我们比较了三个位置之间的输液流速。使用方差分析(ANOVA)进行所有三个研究组的输注速率的统计分析和比较。结果。猪的平均体重为71公斤(64-84公斤)。在所有三个位置均确认成功放置IO针。肱骨近端的平均输注流速为213 mL / min(标准差[SD] 53.2 mL / min),股骨远端的平均输注流速为138 mL / min(SD 65.3 mL / min),103 mL / min(SD 48.1) mL / min)(胫骨近端)(p <0.001)。通过肱骨近端的流速在统计学上大于胫骨近端和股骨远端的流速(p <0.001)。通过胫骨近端和股骨远端的流速相似。结论。肱骨是适合放置IO的替代部位,当使患者复苏时,其流速可能高于胫骨近端和股骨远端。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号