首页> 外文期刊>Paddy and Water Environment >Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching losses from paddy fields with different water and nitrogen managements
【24h】

Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching losses from paddy fields with different water and nitrogen managements

机译:不同水氮管理条件下水田的氮磷淋失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While many water-saving rice production techniques have been adopted in China, the environmental effects of these techniques require further investigation. This study aims to assess nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) leaching losses under real conditionsin different water and N managements. Two water and three N treatments are conducted in the Taihu Lake region of China. Results show that the total N leaching losses during the rice season under flooding irrigation (FI) are 12.4, 9.31, and 7.17 kg ha~(-1) for farmers' fertilization practices (FFP), site-specific N management (SSNM), and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer management (CRN), respectively. Under controlled irrigation (CI), the respective losses were 7.40, 5.86, and 3.79 kg ha~(-1) forthe same management methods. The total P leaching losses during the rice season under FI were 0.939, 0.927, and 0.353 kg ha~(-1) for FFP, SSNM, and CRN, respectively. Under CI, the losses were 0.424, 0.433, and 0.279 kg ha~(-1), respectively, for the same management methods. Ammonium and nitrate N accounted for 42.2-65.5% and 11.8-14.7% of the total nitrogen leaching losses under different water and N management methods, respectively. Due to significant decrease of volumes of percolation water and nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in percolation water, N and P leaching losses were reduced in the CI treatment compared to the FI treatment under the same N management. The reduction of N input and application of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizercan reduce N and P leaching losses from paddy fields.
机译:尽管中国已经采用了许多节水水稻生产技术,但这些技术对环境的影响还需要进一步研究。本研究旨在评估在不同水和氮管理下实际条件下氮(N)和磷(P)的淋失损失。在中国的太湖地区进行了两种水和三种氮处理。结果表明,对于农民的施肥实践(FFP),针对特定地点的氮素管理(SSNM),在稻田中,洪水灌溉(FI)下的总氮淋失损失分别为12.4、9.31和7.17 kg ha〜(-1),和控释氮肥管理(CRN)。在相同的管理方法下,控制灌溉(CI)下的损失分别为7.40、5.86和3.79 kg ha〜(-1)。 FFP,SSNM和CRN分别在FI下水稻季节的总磷淋失量分别为0.939、0.927和0.353 kg ha〜(-1)。在相同的管理方法下,CI下的损失分别为0.424、0.433和0.279 kg ha〜(-1)。在不同水和氮管理方法下,铵态氮和硝态氮分别占总氮淋失损失的42.2-65.5%和11.8-14.7%。由于渗滤水的体积以及渗滤水中氮和磷的浓度显着降低,与相同氮管理下的FI处理相比,CI处理的N和P淋溶损失减少了。减少氮素的投入和控释氮肥的施用可以减少稻田氮磷的淋失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号