首页> 外文期刊>Paediatric anaesthesia >A novel intubation technique in bilateral cleft palate pediatric patients: hard gum shield-aided intubation.
【24h】

A novel intubation technique in bilateral cleft palate pediatric patients: hard gum shield-aided intubation.

机译:双侧left裂小儿患者的一种新型插管技术:硬胶盾牌辅助插管。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cleft palate anesthesia is challenging due to difficult airway. Left paraglossal intubation moves resting point of laryngoscope laterally but associated with narrower laryngoscopic view and possible trauma, and we invented the use of hard gum shield as a bridge over defective palate to facilitate intubation with possible wider window and defective tissue protection.Eighty bilateral cleft palate children, ASA physical status I-II aged 9 months to 6 years scheduled for plastic surgery had general anesthesia, were involved in prospective, controlled, randomized study, and were randomly divided by closed envelope method into two groups: group I (40 patients): intubated by hard gum shield-aided intubation and group II (40 patients): intubated by left paraglossal intubation. Both techniques compared as regards (i) intubation time; (ii) Cormack and Lehane score; (iii) need for external laryngeal manipulation; (iv) easiness of intubation: easy, modest, or difficult intubation; and (v) complications: desaturation and failed intubation.Intubation time was shorter in group I (28.47 ± 3.78 vs. 37.63 ± 6.64 s, P = 0.001). Cormack and Lehane score was better in group I (P = 0.003). Need for external laryngeal manipulation was less in group I (P = 0.015). Easiness of intubation was better in group I (P = 0.022). No difference was found in complications between groups.Hard gum shield-aided intubation facilitated intubation more than left paraglossal in bilateral cleft palate children with shorter intubation time, better glottic view, easier intubation, less need for laryngeal manipulation than left paraglossal intubation with no difference in complications.
机译:由于气道困难,left裂麻醉具有挑战性。左舌旁插管使喉镜的静止点横向移动,但与狭窄的喉镜视野和可能的创伤相关联,因此我们发明了使用硬质牙龈防护罩作为缺陷defective上的桥梁,以促进可能的更宽窗口和组织保护缺陷的插管。 9个月至6岁,计划接受整形手术的9个月至6岁的ASA身体状况I-II的儿童进行了全身麻醉,参与了前瞻性,对照,随机研究,并采用封闭包膜法随机分为两组:I组(40例患者) :用硬胶盾牌辅助插管和II组(40例)插管:用左舌旁插管插管。两种技术在(i)插管时间方面进行了比较; (ii)Cormack和Lehane得分; (iii)需要进行外部喉咙操纵; (iv)插管的容易程度:容易,适度或困难的插管; (v)并发症:去饱和和插管失败。第一组的插管时间较短(28.47±3.78 vs. 37.63±6.64 s,P = 0.001)。第一组的Cormack和Lehane评分更好(P = 0.003)。 I组较少需要进行外部喉咙操作(P = 0.015)。第一组的插管容易性更好(P = 0.022)。两组之间的并发症无差异。硬胶盾牌辅助插管比双侧pa裂儿童插管要多于左舌旁插管,插管时间短,声门视野好,插管容易,与左舌旁插管相比不需要喉操作,无差异在并发症中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号