首页> 外文期刊>Poultry International >Banning antibiotic growth promoters: Learning from the European experience
【24h】

Banning antibiotic growth promoters: Learning from the European experience

机译:禁止抗生素生长促进剂:借鉴欧洲经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The EU banned the use ofavopardn, a widely used antibiotic feed additive in food-producinq animals in 1997, against the advice of a panel of animal nutrition experts. Two years later came a ban on bacitracin, spiramycin, tylosin and virginiamycin. Once more, the ban was imposed against expert advice, again on the basis of fears of antibiotic resistance spreading via the food chain. How have these bans affected the health of animals and humans? From the first day of 2006, the last antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) were banned from use in food-producing animals in the European Union. Several years have passed since the first ban on AFAs was implemented and some other countries are proposing similar action, so it is worthwhile to assess the results of these bans on antibiotic resistance in microorganisms as well as the health of food-producing animals and humans.
机译:欧盟于1997年在动物营养专家小组的建议下禁止在食品生产动物中使用广泛使用的抗生素饲料添加剂avopardn。两年后,禁止使用杆菌肽,螺旋霉素,泰乐菌素和维吉尼亚霉素。再一次,由于担心抗生素抗性会通过食物链传播,因此禁止专家建议。这些禁令如何影响动物和人类的健康?从2006年第一天开始,欧盟禁止在生产食物的动物中使用最后一种抗生素饲料添加剂(AFA)。自从首次实施AFA禁令以来已经过去了数年,其他一些国家也提出了类似的行动,因此,有必要评估这些禁令对微生物的抗生素耐药性以及食品生产动物和人类健康的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号