...
首页> 外文期刊>Social history of medicine: the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine >Christoph Gradmann and Jonathan Simon (eds). Evaluating and Standardizing Therapeutic Agents, 1890-1950, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Pp. xiv + 266. pound 55,00. ISBN 978 0 230 20281 8.
【24h】

Christoph Gradmann and Jonathan Simon (eds). Evaluating and Standardizing Therapeutic Agents, 1890-1950, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. Pp. xiv + 266. pound 55,00. ISBN 978 0 230 20281 8.

机译:Christoph Gradmann和Jonathan Simon(eds)。 《评估和标准化治疗剂》,1890-1950年,贝辛斯托克:Palgrave Macmillan,2010年。 xiv +266。英镑55,00。国际标准书号978 0 230 20281 8。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Toward the end of the nineteenth century and the early decades of the twentieth, new kinds of therapeutic agents began to enter medical practice. In contrast to traditional medicines, which were mainly plant extracts or inorganic substances, the newer agents, including antibacterial sera, therapeutic vaccines and hormones, were largely derived from living organisms. Since the exact chemical composition of these 'biologicals' was frequently unknown, determination of potency and, in clinical use, dosage, depended in the first instance not on measurement of quantities of chemical constituents, but on the creation of quantifiable physiological tests. The development and standardisation of these tests, and their embedding in practices and institutions, which came to be referred to by the German term Wertbestimmung (determination- oivalue), are the subjects of this volume. In their introduction the editors rightly point out that the history of Wertbestimmung may be understood as part of a wider movement of standardisation in science, technology and industry in the decades around 1900, with connections to changes in the financing of health care, and to the public health movement, in Western countries. More directly pertinent to the papers collected here is their insistence that Wertbestimmung in relation to biologicals was a complex process in which the methods of standardisation could take different and independent forms, and in the development of which researchers, industrialists, clinicians and health administrators all played distinguishable but interacting roles.
机译:在19世纪末和20世纪初期,新的治疗药物开始进入医学实践。与主要是植物提取物或无机物的传统药物相反,包括抗菌素血清,治疗性疫苗和激素在内的新型药物主要来自活生物体。由于这些“生物制剂”的确切化学成分通常是未知的,因此效力的确定以及在临床使用中的剂量首先不取决于化学成分的量,而是取决于可量化的生理学测试。这些测试方法的开发和标准化,以及它们在实践和机构中的嵌入,这些术语后来被德国术语Wertbestimmung(测定油价)所指。编辑们在引言中正确地指出,Wertbestimmung的历史可以理解为1900年左右几十年来科学,技术和工业标准化运动的一部分,与卫生保健筹资的变化,西方国家的公共卫生运动。与这里收集的论文更直接相关的是,他们坚持认为与生物学有关的Wertbestimmung是一个复杂的过程,在此过程中标准化方法可以采取不同且独立的形式,并且研究人员,工业家,临床医生和卫生管理人员都在发挥作用独特但相互作用的角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号