首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy >The clinical effectiveness of therapeutic massage for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review
【24h】

The clinical effectiveness of therapeutic massage for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review

机译:治疗性按摩治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的临床疗效:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of therapeutic massage (TM) for the symptomatic relief of musculoskeletal pain, and to analyse TM intervention protocols used in studies. Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials and experimental studies on healthy human participants. Participants: Patients with musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants with post-exercise pain and soreness. Main outcome measures: Comparisons of TM with: (i) no treatment; (ii) sham interventions; and (iii) active (standard) treatment. Outcome was dichotomised as effective (TM > comparison group) or not effective (TM ≤ comparison group). Results: Twenty studies (1341 participants) met the criteria for review. TM was superior to no treatment in five out of 10 comparisons, superior to sham (laser) treatment in one out of two comparisons, and superior to active treatment in seven out of 22 comparisons. TM was superior to comparison groups in six out of 11 studies using patients with musculoskeletal pain, and in three out of seven studies using patients with low back pain. TM was superior to comparison groups in four out of nine studies using healthy participants experiencing post-exercise pain and soreness. There were no relationships between study outcome and the TM regimen used. Conclusions: The available evidence is inconclusive. A combination of inadequate sample sizes, low methodological quality and insufficient TM dosing is likely to have contributed to the confused evidence base. 2006 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy.
机译:目的:确定治疗性按摩(TM)对缓解肌肉骨骼疼痛的功效,并分析研究中使用的TM干预方案。设计:对健康人的随机对照临床试验和实验研究的系统评价。参与者:肌肉骨骼疼痛患者和运动后疼痛与酸痛的健康参与者。主要结果指标:TM与以下各项的比较:(i)不治疗; (ii)虚假干预; (iii)积极(标准)治疗。结果分为有效(TM>对照组)或无效(TM≤对照组)。结果:二十项研究(1341名参与者)符合审查标准。在10个比较中,TM优于无治疗;在两个比较中,TM优于假(激光)治疗;在22个比较中,TM优于主动治疗。在使用肌肉骨骼疼痛的患者的11项研究中,有6项使用TM优于对照组,而在使用腰背部疼痛的患者的7项研究中,有3项是TM优于对照组。在九名研究对象中,有四名使用健康参与者进行运动后疼痛和酸痛,TM优于对照组。研究结果与使用的TM方案之间没有关系。结论:现有证据尚无定论。样本量不足,方法学质量低和TM剂量不足的组合很可能导致混淆的证据基础。 2006年英国理疗学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号