...
首页> 外文期刊>Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds: The Journal of International Society for Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds >Focused Microw Ave (FMW) Extraction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) From Plant Bioindicators, Comparison with Classical Techniques
【24h】

Focused Microw Ave (FMW) Extraction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) From Plant Bioindicators, Comparison with Classical Techniques

机译:从植物生物指标中聚焦微波提取(FMW)提取多环芳烃(PAH),与经典技术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Extraction efficiencies of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAHs) from spruce neelds (Picea abies) obtained by recently introduced "focused microwave assisted (FMW) extraction" (i) and conventional methods represented by extraction enhanced by sonication (ii) and Soxhlet extraction (iii) were compared. n-Hexane: acetone (azeotropic ratio, 53.5 wt% of acetone) extraction mixtures was used in all experiments. The influence of various parameters (extraction time, intensity of iirradiation, moisture content) both on the recoveries of PAHs from spruce needles (Picea abies) and the amount of co-isolated matrix components potentially interfering within the determinative step was examined. The mean extraction efficiencies of PAHs obtained by FMW extraction and sonication were found to be lower (82% and 75%, respectively) compared the extraction in Soxhlet apparatus (equal 100 %).
机译:通过最近引入的“聚焦微波辅助(FMW)提取”(i)和以超声处理增强的提取(ii)和索氏提取(iii)代表的传统方法从云杉籽(Picea abies)中提取多环芳族化合物(PAHs)的效率比较。在所有实验中均使用正己烷:丙酮(共沸比,丙酮的53.5 wt%)萃取混合物。研究了各种参数(提取时间,辐照强度,水分含量)对从云杉针(Picea abies)中回收的PAHs以及在确定步骤中可能干扰的共分离基质成分的量的影响。与通过索氏萃取仪进行萃取(分别为100%)相比,通过FMW萃取和超声处理获得的PAHs的平均萃取效率较低(分别为82%和75%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号