首页> 外文期刊>Poiesis & praxis >Scientific autonomy and planned research:the case of space science
【24h】

Scientific autonomy and planned research:the case of space science

机译:科学自主与计划研究:以空间科学为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scientific research that requires space flight has always been subject to comparatively strong external control.Its agenda has often had to be adapted to vacillating political target specifications.Can space scientists appeal to one or the other form of the widely acknowledged principle of freedom of research in order to claim more autonomy? In this paper,the difficult question of autonomy within planned research is approached by examining three arguments that support the principle of freedom of research in differing ways.Each argument has its particular strengths and limitations.Together they serve to demonstrate particular advantages of scientific autonomy,but in the case of space science,their force ultimately remains limited.However,as the arguments highlight the interrelations between scientific autonomy,the democratic process and the collective interest in scientific knowledge,they suggest that a coherent and sustained space science agenda might best be ensured by increasing the transparency of science policy decisions and involving the democratic public.
机译:要求太空飞行的科学研究一直受到相对较强的外部控制,其议程通常必须调整以抵消政治目标的规格要求。太空科学家能否诉诸于公认的研究自由原则中的一种或另一种形式。为了要求更多的自治权?本文通过研究以不同方式支持研究自由原则的三个论点来解决计划研究中的自治难题。每种论点都有其独特的优势和局限性,它们共同证明了科学自主性的特殊优势,但是,就空间科学而言,它们的力量最终仍然有限。但是,由于论点强调了科学自主性,民主进程和对科学知识的集体兴趣之间的相互关系,因此他们建议,最好将一个连贯而持久的空间科学议程放在首位。通过增加科学政策决策的透明度并让民主公众参与来确保。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号