首页>
外文期刊>Planters' Chronicle
>(2014) 361 ITR 663 (Cal) (In the Calcutta High Court) Commissioner of Income Tax V.Mcleod Russel (India) Ltd Girish Chandra Gupta and Tapash Mookherjee JJ. _February 10, 2014
【24h】
(2014) 361 ITR 663 (Cal) (In the Calcutta High Court) Commissioner of Income Tax V.Mcleod Russel (India) Ltd Girish Chandra Gupta and Tapash Mookherjee JJ. _February 10, 2014
The appeal is directed against a judgement and order dated 30th March, 2001, passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal. Aggrieved by the order, the Revenue has come up in appeal which was admitted by an order dated 4th April, 2003. Three several questions of law were formulated. The first question reads as follows "(1) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in holding that Vibro Bed Drier is an item covered under Appendix-1 III.(3)(iii)A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 and is entitled for 100 percent depreciation ?"
展开▼
机译:上诉针对的是学识渊博的上诉法庭于2001年3月30日作出的判决和命令。受该命令的困扰,2003年4月4日的一项命令承认了税收的上诉。制定了三个法律问题。第一个问题如下:((1)在案件的事实和情况下,所得税上诉法庭是否认为Vibro Bed Drier是附录1 III。(3)(iii)涵盖的项目在法律上是合理的? 1962年《所得税规则》的其中一项,是否有权享有100%的折旧?”
展开▼