首页> 外文期刊>Plant Ecology >Restoring plant species diversity and community composition in a ponderosa pine-bunchgrass ecosystem
【24h】

Restoring plant species diversity and community composition in a ponderosa pine-bunchgrass ecosystem

机译:在美国黄松-松草生态系统中恢复植物物种多样性和群落组成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Monitoring of ecological restoration treatments often focuses on changes in community structure and function. We suggest that long-term changes in community composition also need to be explicitly considered when evaluating the success of restoration treatments. In 1992, we initiated an experiment in a ponderosa pine-bunchgrass ecosystem to evaluate responses to restoration treatments: (a) thinning the overstory vegetation ('thinning'), (b) thinning plus forest floor manipulation with periodic prescribed burning ('composite'), and (c) untreated 'control.' Treatments were further stratified by forest patch type: presettlement tree clumps (trees that established prior to the onset of fire exclusion in 1876), patches of retained postsettlement trees, patches where all postsettlement trees were removed, and remnant grass openings. Species richness did not differ among treatments for 10 years, but was highest in the composite treatment in 11th and 12th year after initial treatment. Community composition diverged among treatments 5 years after initial treatment, and compositional changes were greatest in the composite treatment. Species richness and composition differed among patch types prior to treatment. Remnant grass patches were the most diverse and presettlement patches were the least diverse. Following treatment, species richness in the postsettlement removed and retained patches, gradually approached levels found in remnant grass patches. Compositional differences among patch types changed a little by 2005. Species richness at the 2 mpo scale increased only where the overstory was thinned and the understory was burned. However, these changes may not be detectable for many years, and can vary temporally in response to events such as severe droughts. Nonnative species establishment may be reduced by scheduling longer burn intervals or by refraining from burning where fuel loads are not hazardous, though these options may hinder goals of increasing diversity. Restoring species diversity and community composition continues to be more difficult than restoring ecosystem structure and function.
机译:生态恢复治疗的监测通常着眼于社区结构和功能的变化。我们建议,在评估恢复治疗的成功性时,还需要明确考虑社区组成的长期变化。 1992年,我们在美国黄松-松树草生态系统中启动了一项实验,以评估对恢复措施的反应:(a)疏over过茂密的植被(“稀疏”),(b)疏plus加上定期进行指定焚烧的林地处理(“复合”) ),以及(c)未经处理的“对照”。根据森林斑块类型进一步对处理方法进行分层:预先安置的树木丛(在1876年火灾排除之前建立的树木),保留的后期安置树的补丁,移除所有后期安置树的补丁以及残余的草木开口。物种丰富度在10年间没有差异,但在初始处理后的第11年和第12年,复合处理中的物种丰富度最高。初始治疗后的5年间,社区组成在治疗之间存在差异,并且复合治疗中的组成变化最大。处理之前,斑块类型之间的物种丰富度和组成有所不同。残留的草斑是最多样化的,而预设的草斑是最少的。经过处理后,沉降后的物种丰富度被去除并保留了斑块,逐渐达到了残留草斑中的水平。到2005年,斑块类型之间的成分差异有所变化。只有在表层稀疏和下层被烧毁的情况下,2 mpo规模的物种丰富度才会增加。但是,这些变化可能很多年都无法检测到,并且可能会因严重干旱等事件而随时间变化。通过安排更长的燃烧间隔或在燃料负载无害的情况下避免燃烧,可以减少非本地物种的建立,尽管这些选择可能会阻碍增加多样性的目标。恢复物种多样性和群落组成比恢复生态系统的结构和功能更加困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号