...
首页> 外文期刊>Plant disease management reports PDMR >Foliar and drip applications of biopesticides evaluated for managing Phytophthora blight on pumpkin, 2006
【24h】

Foliar and drip applications of biopesticides evaluated for managing Phytophthora blight on pumpkin, 2006

机译:评估了农药在农药中的叶面和滴灌应用,以防治南瓜疫霉病,2006年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination treatment schedule of foliar and drip applications of seven EPA-classified biopesticides that are at the advanced or demonstration (labeled) level of development for Phytophthora blight onpumpkin. Phytophthora blight is a devastating disease for which there have been no adequately efficacious control options, and growers have stated that they would use chemigation as a means to control this pathogen if it was found to be effective. Threebiological fungicides, Actinovate (Streptomyces lydicus WYEC 108), Kodiak (Bacillus subtilis GB03), and Yield Shield (Bacillus pumilis GB34),were evaluated along with a combination treatment of Promax (thyme oil) applied through the drip and Proud-3 (thyme oil) applied to the foliage. Two phosphorous acid products, ProPhyt and Fosphite, were also evaluated because a similar product, Phostrol,was foundto be effective in controlling Phytophthora blight in pumpkin in a previous experiment at LIHREC. All treatments were compared to a current grower standard fungicide program of weekly alternating foliar applications of three EPA-registered, conventionalfungicideslabeled for this use (Forum, Gavel, and Tanos) and a second combination program with two conventional fungicides not registered that have performed well in other experiments (Maestro 80 DF and Revus 250L) plus two registered, labeled fungicides (conventionalRanman and biopesticide ProPhyt). Some applications in these programs included Cuprofix Disperss for resistance management. A field experiment was conducted at LIHREC on Haven loam soil where Phytophthora blight had developed in 1991 to 1993, 1995 to1999, and 2003 to 2005. The field was plowed on 18 Apr and tilled on 2 May. Fertilizer (N-P-K 10-10-10) at 500 lb/A was broadcast and incorporated on 12 Jun. Eleven rows of black plastic mulch each with two strips of Aquatraxx drip tape were laid on 14 Jun.‘Munchkin’ pumpkin seed was planted in a greenhouse on 14 Jun and seedlings were transplanted on 30 Jun into the plastic mulch between the two strips of drip tape. On 29 Jun, the day before transplanting, plants to be treated with ProPhyt or Fosphite received adrench application of 20 ml/seedling of a 0.5% solution of each fungicide into their growing cells in the greenhouse. During the season weeds were controlled by cultivation, roto-tilling, and hand weeding. Asana XL (9.6 fl oz/A) was applied for cucumberbeetle control on 7 Aug. Plots were single 20-ft rows spaced at least 11 ft apart. There was 5-ft between plots. A randomized complete block design with four replications was used. Average monthly high and low temperatures (oF) were 77/62 in Jun, 84/69 in Jul, 82/67 in Aug, 73/58in Sep, and 64/48 in Oct. Rainfall (in.) was 5.83, 3.79, 5.48, 3.66, and 5.53 for these months, respectively. Foliar treatments were applied preventatively beginning on 26 Jul and continuing bi-weekly for most treatments on 9 Aug, 23 Aug, 7 Sep, and 21 Sep with atractor-mounted boom sprayer operated at 120 psi and 85 gal/A and equipped with D5-25 hollow cone nozzles spaced 17 in. apart. Drip applications were applied bi-weekly on alternate weeks of the foliar applications on 2 Aug, 15 Aug, 1 Sep, and 13 Sep. Thetape had 12-in. emitter spacing and a flow rate of 0.45 gal/min. The injection period for each drip application was 45 minutes using a separate Mazzei~R injector for each treatment. Drip tape in the four plots for each treatment was connected with blankirrigation tubing. SincePhytophthora blight did not develop on its own, likely due to low rainfall and high temperatures, the field was artificially inoculated with 1 tsp (10-15 seeds) of beet seed infested with P. capsici to the soil around the first and last plant in each plot on 15 Aug. All plots were examined on 1 Sep and no infection was found on any plants. On 5 Sep, one orange fruit at the beginning and end of each plot was inoculated with a 1-in.2 piece of an infected pumpkin
机译:这项研究的目的是评估叶面和滴灌联合应用的7种EPA分类的生物农药的治疗方案的功效,这些农药处于疫霉疫病的晚期或示范(标记)发育水平。疫霉疫病是一种破坏性疾病,尚无足够有效的控制方法,种植者表示,如果发现这种病原体有效,他们将使用化学迁移法来控制这种病原体。对三种生物杀菌剂,放线菌酸盐(Streptomyces lydicus WYEC 108),科迪亚克菌(枯草芽孢杆菌GB03)和产量盾牌菌(枯草芽孢杆菌GB34)进行了评估,并结合了通过滴注的Promax(百里香油)和Proud-3(百里香)的组合​​处理。油)涂在叶子上。还评估了两种亚磷酸产品ProPhyt和亚磷酸酯,因为在LIHREC的先前实验中发现类似的产品Phostrol可有效控制南瓜疫霉病。将所有处理方法与当前种植者标准杀真菌剂程序进行比较,该方案是每周交替叶面施用三种经EPA注册的为此目的标记的常规杀菌剂(Forum,Gavel和Tanos)和第二种联合方案,其中两种未注册的常规杀真菌剂在以下情况下均表现良好其他实验(Maestro 80 DF和Revus 250L),外加两个已注册的标记杀真菌剂(常规的Ranman和生物农药ProPhyt)。这些程序中的某些应用程序包括用于阻力管理的Cuprofix分散剂。在LIHREC上进行了田间试验,该田在1991年至1993年,1995年至1999年以及2003年至2005年发展为疫霉疫的避风壤土上。该田于4月18日耕种,并于5月2日耕种。在6月12日播撒了肥料(NPK 10-10-10),重量为500 lb / A,并于6月12日掺入。在11月14日铺设了11行黑色塑料覆盖物,每个覆盖有两条Aquatraxx滴灌带。 6月14日的温室和6月30日的秧苗被移植到两条滴水带之间的塑料地膜中。 6月29日,即移植前一天,将要用ProPhyt或Fosphite处理的植物向温室中的生长细胞中注入20 ml /种0.5%的每种杀菌剂溶液的幼苗。在这个季节中,杂草通过耕种,旋转耕作和手工除草来控制。 Asana XL(9.6 fl oz / A)于8月7日用于黄瓜甲虫防治。地块为20英尺的单行,间距至少11英尺。地块之间有5英尺。使用具有四个重复的随机完整块设计。 6月的平均每月高温和低温(oF)为6月的77 / 62、7月的84 / 69、8月的82 / 67、9月的73/58和10月的64/48。降雨量(英寸)为5.83、3.79,这两个月分别为5.48、3.66和5.53。从7月26日开始预防性地进行叶面处理,对于大多数处理,每两周一次,每两周进行一次,在120 psi和85 gal / A的条件下,使用装有牵引器的吊杆喷雾器并配备D5- 25个空心圆锥形喷嘴,间距为17英寸。在8月2日,8月15日,9月1日和9月13日的叶面施肥隔周,每两周进行一次滴灌。Thetape的浸入量为12英寸。发射器间距和0.45 gal / min的流速。使用单独的Mazzei〜R注射器进行每次处理,每次滴注的注射时间为45分钟。将每种处理的四个样地中的滴灌带与空白灌溉管连接。由于疫霉菌本身并没有发展,可能是由于降雨少和高温造成的,所以该田地被人为接种了1茶匙(10-15种子)甜菜种子的辣椒种子,该甜菜种子被辣椒疫霉病菌侵染到第一株和最后一株植物周围的土壤中。每个小区在8月15日进行。所有小区在9月1日进行了检查,在任何植物上均未发现感染。 9月5日,在每个试验区的开始和结束处的一个橙色水果上接种了1英寸2英寸的被感染南瓜

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号