...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Subsidized agricultural resettlements as drivers of tropical deforestation. (Special Issue: Advancing environmental conservation. Essays in honor of Navjot Sodhi.)
【24h】

Subsidized agricultural resettlements as drivers of tropical deforestation. (Special Issue: Advancing environmental conservation. Essays in honor of Navjot Sodhi.)

机译:对农业安置进行补贴,作为热带森林砍伐的驱动力。 (特刊:推进环境保护。为纪念纳乔·索迪而写的论文。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Agricultural encroachment into low-governance forest frontiers including vast tracts of hitherto unclaimed public lands and indigenous territories represents one of the most abrupt land-use transitions in tropical countries. This often results from spontaneous migration from more heavily-settled regions or direct subsidies from land redistribution programs prescribed by central-government policy. Here, we briefly review the spatial scale and environmental consequences of agrarian resettlement schemes in tropical forest countries, and explore the policy contradictions of competing government agencies in shaping conflicting rationales for either conservation or rural development. We focus on the largest tropical forest region on Earth, the Brazilian Amazon, which continues to attract one of the largest waves of land-tenured and landless migrant farmers from elsewhere in Brazil. We argue that the environmental and monetary costs associated with these resettlement schemes are rarely outweighed by the socioeconomic benefits accrued to translocated farmers. Land-use planning in lowland tropical forest regions like Amazonia would benefit from a truly integrated policy framework that bridges the divide between conflicting government sectors, particularly in relation to smallholder occupation of previously intact forest areas, which increasingly contributes with a significant fraction of deforestation in many regions.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.011
机译:农业入侵低治理森林的边界,包括迄今未获保护的大片公共土地和土著领土,是热带国家最突然的土地利用过渡之一。这通常是由于来自人口稠密地区的自发迁移或中央政府政策规定的土地再分配计划的直接补贴所致。在这里,我们简要回顾了热带森林国家农业安置计划的空间规模和环境后果,并探讨了竞争政府机构在形成相互矛盾的保护或农村发展理由时的政策矛盾。我们专注于地球上最大的热带森林地区,即巴西亚马逊地区,该地区继续吸引着来自巴西其他地方的最大的土地保有权和无地移民农民浪潮之一。我们认为,与这些安置计划相关的环境和金钱成本很少能被转移给农民的社会经济利益所抵消。像亚马逊地区这样的低地热带森林地区的土地利用规划将受益于一个真正的综合政策框架,该框架可以弥合冲突政府部门之间的鸿沟,特别是在小农占领以前完好无损的森林方面,这在森林砍伐中占了很大比重。许多地区。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.011

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号