...
【24h】

CO again

机译:再次CO

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Carbon monoxide (CO) is not responsible for many mining fatalities. A significant reason is that there are miners and operators looking for CO and protecting against it in the mines. Off the job, the sources of CO around the house are the furnace and any other combustion source. Vehicles are a potentially lethal source of CO, both at home and at mines. Two CO deaths involving two cultures and vehicles 7,000 miles apart deserve some attention. From Japan: Dr Motoki Osawa, in a 2003 Supplement to Legal Medicine, reports a fatality from CO in a vehicle in an open field. It is fairly common for CO fatalities to occur in vehicles in garages. So, when Osawa was confronted with a suspected CO fatality in an open field, he was determined to investigate the circumstances, do an autopsy on the victim and examine the vehicle. The sequence of events, vehicle examination and reconstruction disclosed that, after leaving a party, the victim went to his car, started the engine and "took a rest." Ingestion of alcohol at a company party, earlier, may have precipitated the rest. A door and a window were partly open, but that combination was not enough to compensate for a broken exhaust pipe and a chink in the floor-mounted emergency brake apparatus.
机译:一氧化碳(CO)与许多采矿死亡无关。一个重要的原因是,有些矿工和运营商正在寻找二氧化碳并在矿井中保护其免受二氧化碳的侵害。下班后,房屋周围的CO来源是熔炉和任何其他燃烧源。在家庭和矿山中,车辆都是潜在的致命性CO排放源。涉及两种文化和距离相距7,000英里的车辆的两次CO死亡值得关注。来自日本:Mosaki Osawa博士在2003年法律医学增刊中报告了在露天场所一辆车中CO致死的情况。在车库中的车辆中发生CO死亡相当普遍。因此,当小泽在一个空旷的地方遇到可疑的死于CO的死亡时,他决心调查情况,对受害者进行尸检并检查车辆。事件的顺序,车辆检查和重建表明,离开聚会后,受害人上了车,启动了发动机并“休息了”。早些时候在公司聚会上喝酒可能会使剩下的沉淀。门和窗户部分打开,但是这种组合不足以弥补落地式紧急制动装置中排气管的损坏和缝隙。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号