...
首页> 外文期刊>Plant and Soil >Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 3. Soil water distribution and dynamics.
【24h】

Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 3. Soil water distribution and dynamics.

机译:树木行农林业系统的竞争。 3.土壤水分分布和动力学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that soil water content would vary spatially with distance from a tree row and that the effect would differ according to tree species. A field study was conducted on a kaolinitic Oxisol in the sub-humid highlands of western Kenya to compare soil water distribution and dynamics in a maize monoculture with that under maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with a 3-year-old tree row of Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. Ex R. Br. (grevillea) and hedgerow of Senna spectabilis DC. (senna). Soil water content was measured at weekly intervals during one cropping season using a neutron probe. Measurements were made from 20 cm to a depth of 225 cm at distances of 75, 150, 300 and 525 cm from the tree rows. The amount of water stored was greater under the sole maize crop than the agroforestry systems, especially the grevillea-maize system. Stored soil water in the grevillea-maize system increased with increasing distance from the tree row but in the senna-maize system, it decreased between 75 and 300 cm from the hedgerow. Soil water content increased least and more slowly early in the season in the grevillea-maize system, and drying was also evident as the frequency of rain declined. Soil water content at the end of the cropping season was similar to that at the start of the season in the grevillea-maize system, but about 50 and 80 mm greater in the senna-maize and sole maize systems, respectively. The seasonal water balance showed there was 140 mm of drainage from the sole maize system. A similar amount was lost from the agroforestry systems (about 160 mm in the grevillea-maize system and 145 mm in the senna-maize system) through drainage or tree uptake. The possible benefits of reduced soil evaporation and crop transpiration close to a tree row were not evident in the grevillea-maize system, but appeared to greatly compensate for water uptake losses in the senna-maize system. Grevillea, managed as a tree row, reduced stored soil water to a greater extent than senna, managed as a hedgerow.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验以下假设:土壤水含量会随着距一排树的距离而在空间上变化,并且其影响会因树种而异。在肯尼亚西部半湿润的高地上对高岭土Oxisol进行了田间研究,比较了玉米单作栽培与玉米(Zea mays L.)间种有3年树龄行的玉米下的土壤水分分布和动态。格雷韦拉·罗伯斯塔·A·坎恩前R.Br. (grevillea)和Senna spectabilis DC的树篱。 (番泻叶)。使用中子探针在一个种植季节中每周测量一次土壤含水量。在距树行75、150、300和525 cm的距离处进行20厘米至225厘米深度的测量。单一玉米作物下的储水量大于农林业系统,尤其是格列维勒玉米系统。 grevillea-玉米系统中储存的土壤水随着距树行距离的增加而增加,但在番泻叶-玉米系统中,其距树篱的距离在75至300 cm之间。在grevillea-玉米系统中,土壤水分在季节初期增加得最少,并且增速较慢,并且随着降雨频率的下降,干燥也很明显。播种季节结束时,格雷维勒玉米系统的土壤含水量与本季开始时相似,但番泻叶玉米和唯一玉米系统的土壤含水量分别高出50毫米和80毫米。季节性水平衡表明,单一玉米系统的排水量为140毫米。通过排水或树木吸收,农用林业系统损失了类似的数量(格雷维尔玉米系统约损失160毫米,番泻叶玉米系统损失约145毫米)。在grevillea-玉米系统中减少土壤蒸发和靠近一排树的农作物蒸腾作用的可能好处并不明显,但似乎可以极大地补偿番泻叶-玉米系统中的水分吸收损失。葛雷维拉(Grevillea)以树行的形式进行管理,与塞纳河(以树篱的形式进行管理)相比,减少的储水量更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号