...
首页> 外文期刊>Planning Practice & Research >The Re-emergence of Regional Policy and Planning in Western Australia
【24h】

The Re-emergence of Regional Policy and Planning in Western Australia

机译:西澳大利亚州区域政策和计划的重新出现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Regional development has long been an important policy concern in Western Australia. As the nation's largest state, covering approximately one-third of Australia's landmass (2.5 million square kilometres), it exhibits considerable environmental, economic and social diversity. It is also a state where primary industries are the key drivers of the economy, particularly agriculture, mining and, to a lesser extent, forestry and fisheries. While these activities are located almost exclusively in non-metropolitan regions, population and capital tend to accumulate in the state's major metropolitan region, Perth. Indeed, of the 1.8 million people living in Western Australia, 1.3 million (72%) live in the Perth metropolitan area (Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2004). At the same time, non-metropolitan areas contribute 82% of Western Australia's export income (Department of Local Government and Regional Development, 2003a). This disparity raises an inevitable tension in Western Australian politics and policy making, with regional areas often arguing that the concentration of public investment in infrastructure and services in the Perth metropolitan area is at the expense of those regions that generate the majority of the state's export income. For much of its history, the State Government of Western Australia dealt with this tension through a series of policies based loosely around the principles of regional economic balance and socio-spatial equity, thereby attempting to ensure that certain regions were not 'left behind' at the expense of others (Tonts & Jones, 1997). There was also a focus on developing industries based on Western Australia's natural resources, since the state's isolation and small population meant that large-scale secondary industries, such as manufacturing, were unlikely to be competitive with other 'core' Australian or Asian regions (Bolton, 1982). Thus, much of the investment in regional development was focused on non-metropolitan areas. The provision of agricultural land for settlers, financial support for farming through credit and subsidies, the construction of railways and other transport infrastructure, government subsidies to the mining industry, and the generous provision of rural social services were central to this strategy.
机译:长期以来,区域发展一直是西澳大利亚州的重要政策关注点。作为澳大利亚最大的州,它覆盖了澳大利亚约三分之一的陆地(250万平方公里),展现出相当大的环境,经济和社会多样性。在该州,第一产业是经济的主要驱动力,特别是农业,采矿业,在较小程度上还包括林业和渔业。尽管这些活动几乎完全位于非大都市地区,但人口和资本往往聚集在该州的主要大都市地区珀斯。实际上,在西澳大利亚州的180万人中,有130万人(占72%)居住在珀斯市区(澳大利亚统计局(ABS),2004年)。同时,非大都市地区贡献了西澳大利亚州出口收入的82%(地方政府和地区发展部,2003a)。这种差距在西澳大利亚州的政治和政策制定中造成了不可避免的紧张局势,该地区经常争辩说,珀斯大都会地区对基础设施和服务的公共投资的集中度损害了该州产生大部分州出口收入的地区的利益。 。在其大部分历史上,西澳大利亚州州政府通过一系列宽松地围绕区域经济平衡和社会空间平等原则的政策来应对这种紧张局势,从而试图确保某些地区不会被“抛弃”。牺牲他人(Tonts&Jones,1997)。由于西澳州的孤立和人口稀少意味着制造业等大型第二产业不太可能与其他“核心”澳大利亚或亚洲地区竞争(Bolton),因此也着重于开发基于西澳大利亚州自然资源的产业。 (1982年)。因此,区域发展的大部分投资都集中在非都市地区。为定居者提供农业用地,通过信贷和补贴为农业提供财政支持,铁路和其他运输基础设施的建设,政府对采矿业的补贴以及慷慨提供农村社会服务是该战略的核心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号