...
首页> 外文期刊>Planning Practice & Research >'Fantasies of Consensus: ' Planning Reform in Sydney, 2005-2013
【24h】

'Fantasies of Consensus: ' Planning Reform in Sydney, 2005-2013

机译:“共识的幻想:”悉尼计划改革,2005-2013年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper examines the battle to reform and streamline the planning system in Sydney, Australia, between 2005 and 2013. It analyses the strategies the State of NSW has pursued to manage ongoing conflicts over development, and reflects on the challenges the State has encountered in its attempt to redefine democratic engagement, justify decisions, claim legitimacy and forge a consensus around a more pro-development planning system. While New South Wales' planning reform strategies have pursued an apparently 'post-political' agenda (Swyngedouw, Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change, Theory Culture and Society, 27(2-3):213-232, 2010), using policy solutions to depoliticize difficult decisions, the reform process has exacerbated rather than defused conflicts. The story raises questions about the extent to which the new governing strategies of a post-political era can offer effective forums to forge consensus, or to stage-manage agreement over metropolitan development conflicts.
机译:本文研究了2005年至2013年间在澳大利亚悉尼进行的改革和精简规划系统的斗争。它分析了新南威尔士州为处理持续的发展冲突而采取的战略,并反思了新州在发展中所面临的挑战尝试重新定义民主参与,为决策辩护,主张合法性并围绕更加有利于发展的计划体系达成共识。尽管新南威尔士州的计划改革战略奉行了一个明显的“后政治”议程(Swyngedouw,《永远的启示》?后政治民粹主义和气候变化的幽灵),《理论文化与社会》,理论文化与社会,27(2-3):213-232 (2010年),使用政策解决方案使困难的决策非政治化,改革进程加剧了冲突,而不是消解了冲突。这个故事引发了一个问题,即后政治时代的新执政策略在多大程度上可以提供有效的论坛,以就大城市发展冲突达成共识或达成阶段性管理协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号