首页> 外文期刊>Physical Review, A. Atomic, molecular, and optical physics >Comment on 'Status of the convergent close-coupling method within the framework of the rigorous Coulomb scattering theory' - art. no. 036701
【24h】

Comment on 'Status of the convergent close-coupling method within the framework of the rigorous Coulomb scattering theory' - art. no. 036701

机译:评论“严格的库仑散射理论框架内的收敛紧密耦合方法的现状”-艺术。没有。 036701

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Shablov, Bilyk, and Popov [Phys. Rev. A 65, 042719 (2002)] claimed to have analyzed the convergent close-coupling (CCC) method within the framework of the rigorous Coulomb scattering theory, but without electron exchange. They concluded that "... the amplitude obtained within the framework of this method in principle does not converge to the observable physical amplitude." We correct a misunderstanding of the origins of the CCC equations, and show that no-exchange CCC calculations exhibit no ready convergence, off or on the energy shell while those with exchange show convergence, but only on the energy shell. Since all previously published comparisons of CCC with experiment utilized on-shell amplitudes from calculations which included exchange, we question the stated conclusion. [References: 6]
机译:Shablov,Bilyk和Popov [Phys。 Rev. A 65,042719(2002)]声称已经在严格的库仑散射理论的框架内分析了收敛紧密耦合(CCC)方法,但是没有电子交换。他们得出结论:“……在此方法的框架内获得的振幅原则上不会收敛到可观察到的物理振幅。”我们纠正了对CCC方程起源的误解,并表明,没有交换的CCC计算在能量壳上或能量壳上都没有现成的收敛性,而那些进行交换的CCC计算则仅在能量壳上具有收敛性。由于以前所有已发表的CCC与实验的比较都利用了包含交换在内的计算得出的壳上振幅,因此我们质疑上述结论。 [参考:6]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号