...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Use of systemic antifungals in daily clinical practice in the haematology and oncology setting: results of a prospective observational analysis.
【24h】

Use of systemic antifungals in daily clinical practice in the haematology and oncology setting: results of a prospective observational analysis.

机译:在血液科和肿瘤科的日常临床实践中使用系统性抗真菌剂:前瞻性观察分析的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To assess the role of systemic antifungal drugs as well as the frequency of potential drug interactions and adverse drug events of commonly used antifungals in an unselected haematology/oncology patient cohort.A prospective analysis was performed in our haematology/oncology department between October 2006 and September 2009. Data were obtained from 250 consecutive patients who received treatment and/or prophylaxis with fluconazole (n?=?191), liposomal amphotericin B (n?=?105), voriconazole (n?=?62), caspofungin (n?=?27) and/or posaconazole (n?=?22). We performed detailed reviews of patient charts and laboratory values in close cooperation with treating physicians and nursing staff and participated regularly in ward and chart rounds. Potential drug interactions were assessed using the electronic database Micromedex? 1.0 (Healthcare Series).In terms of adverse drug events, caspofungin (56%) and voriconazole (58%) revealed a slightly more favourable safety profile than liposomal amphotericin B (66%) and posaconazole (64%). We confirmed frequent nephrotoxic effects with the use of liposomal amphotericin B (20%). Regarding potential drug interactions, 97 (66%) of 147 evaluated patients were exposed to at least 1 of 22 different potentially interacting drug combinations involving systemic antifungal agents. Cyclosporine was the most prevalent potentially interacting drug in our cohort.Systemic antifungal drugs are widely used in the haematology/oncology setting and exhibit numerous potential drug interactions and adverse events in cancer patients. Our results highlight the challenges related to antifungal drugs and should valuably contribute to a safe and efficient application of this increasingly important class of drugs. Copyright ? 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:为了评估未选择的血液学/肿瘤学患者队列中系统性抗真菌药的作用以及常用抗真菌药的潜在药物相互作用和不良药物事件发生的频率,我们于2006年10月至9月在我们的血液学/肿瘤学部门进行了前瞻性分析2009。数据来自连续250例接受氟康唑(n?=?191),脂质体两性霉素B(n?=?105),伏立康唑(n?=?62),卡泊芬净(n?)的治疗和/或预防的患者。 = 27)和/或泊沙康唑(n = 22)。我们与主治医师和护理人员密切合作,对患者图表和实验室值进行了详细的审查,并定期参加病房和图表巡查。使用电子数据库Micromedex?评估潜在的药物相互作用。 1.0(医疗保健系列)。就不良药物事件而言,卡泊芬净(56%)和伏立康唑(58%)的安全性优于脂质体两性霉素B(66%)和泊沙康唑(64%)。我们证实使用脂质体两性霉素B(20%)可产生频繁的肾毒性作用。关于潜在的药物相互作用,在147位评估的患者中,有97位(66%)暴露于22种涉及全身性抗真菌剂的潜在相互作用药物组合中的至少1种。环孢菌素是我们队列中最普遍的潜在相互作用药物。全身性抗真菌药物广泛用于血液学/肿瘤学领域,在癌症患者中表现出多种潜在的药物相互作用和不良反应。我们的结果突出了与抗真菌药物有关的挑战,并应为这种日益重要的药物的安全有效使用做出宝贵的贡献。版权? 2012年John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号