首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparative Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Serological Assays Using Clinically and Serologically Defined Reference Standards and Latent Class Analysis
【24h】

Comparative Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Serological Assays Using Clinically and Serologically Defined Reference Standards and Latent Class Analysis

机译:使用临床和血清学确定的参考标准和潜在类别分析对卡波济氏肉瘤相关疱疹病毒血清学检测方法的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Accurate determination of infection with Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) has been hindered by the lack of a “gold standard” for comparison of serological assays used to estimate KSHV prevalence in serosurveys conducted in different settings. We have evaluated the performance of five in-house (developed at University College London [UCL], United Kingdom, and at the virology laboratory of the Instituto de Medicine Tropical [IMT] in Sao Paulo, Brazil) and two commercial (ABI and DIAVIR) serological assays to detect antibodies to latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) and to lytic KSHV antigens. We used a variety of serum samples assembled to represent populations likely to be at high, intermediate, and low risk of KSHV infection in Brazil. Composite reference standard panels were prepared based on clinical and serological parameters, against which assay performances were assessed using conventional Bayesian statistics and latent class analysis (LCA). Against the clinical reference standard, in-house immunofluorescence assays to detect anti-LANA antibodies (IFA-LANA) produced at UCL and IMT had similar performances, with sensitivities of 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48% to 74%) and 72% (95% CI, 58% to 83%) and specificities of 99% (95% CI, 94% to 100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96% to 100%), respectively, and only the IMT IFA-LANA was included in LCA, together with the IMT IFA-lytic and four enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). The LCA indicated that the IMT whole-virus ELISA performed best (sensitivity, 87% [95% CI, 81% to 91%]; and specificity, 100% [95% CI, 98% to 100%]), confirming the results obtained with the conventional statistical approach. Commercially available ELISA-based tests yielded the lowest specificities using a spectrum of serum samples. The evaluation of KSHV serological assays is warranted before planning serosurveys in various settings.
机译:由于缺乏“金标准”来比较血清学检测中用于评估在不同环境中进行的血清学检查中KSHV患病率的“金标准”,因此无法准确确定卡波西氏肉瘤相关疱疹病毒(KSHV)的感染情况。我们评估了五家内部公司(由英国伦敦大学学院[UCL]和巴西圣保罗热带医学研究所[IMT]的病毒学实验室开发)和两种商业机构(ABI和DIAVIR)的性能)血清学检测法,以检测与潜伏期相关的核抗原(LANA)和裂解性KSHV抗原的抗体。我们使用了各种血清样本进行组装,以代表巴西可能处于KSHV感染的高,中和低风险的人群。根据临床和血清学参数制备复合参考标准板,使用常规贝叶斯统计和潜在分类分析(LCA)评估其检测性能。对照临床参考标准,用于检测在UCL和IMT生产的抗LANA抗体(IFA-LANA)的内部免疫荧光测定法具有相似的性能,灵敏度为61%(95%置信区间[CI],48%至74%) )和72%(95%CI,58%至83%)和特异性分别为99%(95%CI,94%至100%)和100%(95%CI,96%至100%) IMT IFA-LANA连同IMT IFA裂解法和四种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)一起包含在LCA中。 LCA表明IMT全病毒ELISA表现最佳(灵敏度为87%[95%CI,81%至91%];特异性为100%[95%CI,98%至100%]),证实了结果使用常规统计方法获得。市售的基于ELISA的测试使用一系列血清样品产生最低的特异性。在计划各种环境中的血清调查之前,必须对KSHV血清学分析进行评估。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号