首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of monoclonal antibody time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay with monoclonal antibody capture-biotinylated detector enzyme immunoassay for respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus antigen detection.
【24h】

Comparison of monoclonal antibody time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay with monoclonal antibody capture-biotinylated detector enzyme immunoassay for respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus antigen detection.

机译:单克隆抗体时间分辨荧光免疫测定与单克隆抗体捕获-生物素化检测器酶免疫测定在呼吸道合胞病毒和副流感病毒抗原检测中的比较。

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

An all-monoclonal antibody, time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay was compared with several enzyme immunoassays for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus type 1, 2, and 3 antigens in clinical specimens. The most sensitive enzyme immunoassay for parainfluenza virus type 1 was an all-monoclonal antibody assay with biotin-labeled detector antibody and streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate, but for respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus types 2 and 3 the most sensitive assay was a polyclonal antibody assay with horse capture antibodies and bovine or rabbit detector antibodies with anti-species peroxidase. All tests were evaluated with nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens from respiratory illnesses and with cell culture harvests of multiple strains of each virus isolated over many years. The time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay detected respiratory syncytial virus antigen in 92% of the specimens positive by culture, which was a decidedly higher sensitivity than either the monoclonal or polyclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay format (62 and 76%, respectively). For the parainfluenza viruses the time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay detected type-specific antigen in 94 to 100% of culture-positive specimens and again was more sensitive than the all-monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassays (75 to 89%) or all-polyclonal antibody enzyme immunoassays (66 to 95%). Combined with results from a previously reported adenovirus time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay, these tests identified respiratory antigens in large numbers of clinical specimens.
机译:将全单克隆抗体,时间分辨荧光免疫测定与几种酶免疫测定进行了比较,以检测临床标本中的呼吸道合胞病毒和副流感病毒1、2和3型抗原。对1型副流感病毒最敏感的酶免疫分析是一种具有生物素标记的检测抗体和链霉亲和素-过氧化物酶结合物的全单克隆抗体分析,但是对于2型和3型呼吸道合胞病毒和副流感病毒,最敏感的分析是一种多克隆抗体分析带有马捕获抗体和带有抗物种过氧化物酶的牛或兔检测器抗体。所有测试均使用来自呼吸系统疾病的鼻咽抽吸物标本以及多年分离出的每种病毒的多种菌株的细胞培养收获物进行评估。时间分辨荧光免疫分析法在培养阳性的标本中有92%检出呼吸道合胞病毒抗原,其灵敏度明显高于单克隆或多克隆抗体酶免疫法(分别为62%和76%)。对于副流感病毒,时间分辨荧光免疫分析法可在94%至100%的培养阳性样本中检测到类型特异性抗原,并且再次比全单克隆抗体酶免疫分析法(75%至89%)或全多克隆抗体酶免疫分析法灵敏。 (66至95%)。结合先前报道的腺病毒时间分辨荧光免疫分析的结果,这些测试在大量临床标本中鉴定出呼吸道抗原。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号