首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Evaluating maternity care using national administrative health datasets: How are statistics affected by the quality of data on method of delivery?
【24h】

Evaluating maternity care using national administrative health datasets: How are statistics affected by the quality of data on method of delivery?

机译:使用国家行政健康数据集评估产妇保健:统计数据如何受到分娩方法数据质量的影响?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Information on maternity services is increasingly derived from national administrative health data. We evaluated how statistics on maternity care in England were affected by the completeness and consistency of data on “method of delivery” in a national dataset. Methods Singleton deliveries occurring between April 2009 and March 2010 in English NHS trusts were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. In HES, method of delivery can be entered twice: 1) as a procedure code in core fields, and 2) in supplementary maternity fields. We examined overall consistency of these data sources at a national level and among individual trusts. The impact of different analysis rules for handling inconsistent data was then examined using three maternity statistics: emergency caesarean section (CS) rate; third/fourth degree tear rate amongst instrumental deliveries, and elective CS rate for breech presentation. Results We identified 629,049 singleton deliveries. Method of delivery was not entered as a procedure or in the supplementary fields in 0.8% and 12.5% of records, respectively. In 545,594 records containing both data items, method of delivery was coded consistently in 96.3% (kappa?=?0.93; p? Conclusions Organisational maternity statistics are sensitive to inconsistencies in data on method of delivery, and publications of quality indicators should describe how such data were handled. Overall, method of delivery is coded consistently in English administrative health data.
机译:关于产妇服务的背景信息越来越多地来自国家行政健康数据。我们评估了全国数据集中“分娩方法”数据的完整性和一致性如何影响英格兰的产妇护理统计数据。方法从医院病情统计(HES)数据库中提取2009年4月至2010年3月在英语NHS信托中发生的单例分娩。在HES中,分娩方式可以输入两次:1)在核心字段中作为过程代码,以及2)在辅助产妇字段中。我们在国家层面和各个信托机构中检查了这些数据源的总体一致性。然后使用三个产妇统计数据检查了不同分析规则对处理不一致数据的影响:紧急剖腹产(CS)率;器械分娩中的三/四度撕裂率,以及臀位表现的选择性CS率。结果我们确定了629,049单例交付。没有在程序中或补充字段中分别以记录的0.8%和12.5%输入交付方式。在包含两个数据项的545,594条记录中,分娩方法的编码始终一致,为96.3%(kappa == 0.93; p?结论)组织产妇统计数据对分娩方法的数据不一致很敏感,并且质量指标的出版物应说明这种方式总体而言,在英语行政健康数据中一致地编码了提供方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号